Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Kaye: Panthers might start Bryce Young final 7 games


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

With all due respect 7 games isn't going to make or break Johnson's career. He's already a hot name in trade rumors. 

 

If Bryce is bad we simply move on. The season is already over my man.

 

Aren't you ready to move on from this Bryce speculation?

Again, it’s not about making or breaking anyone’s career. I don’t get what is so hard to understand. Thielen was showing signs of irritation in the first two games of the year. It wasn’t about losing. It wasn’t about stats. It was all the times either he was open and ignored or the ball was thrown at his feet/over his head.  Any competitor wants to be given a chance to compete, whether that’s game to game or play to play, they want balls they can catch. Not for stats, for personal satisfaction. That has a huge impact on morale.  
 

and there is no “if”. I’ve long moved on from Bryce speculation, as most have. No one needs to see seven more games to confirm what is already painfully obvious. 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gapanthersfan said:

Bryce’s limitations are physical.  No amount of standing on the sideline will change that. Players, fans… everyone knows that. The media wants the sideshow to continue so they throw this out to try to influence the team’s actions. 

Dave doing this is a big F all of you to the locker room. Bryce is a completely embarrassing, mostly on him guaranteed L where 10 fans show up to the stadium and the sideshow can continue.

Andy is a probable L where he shoulders some blame but he will perform as an NFL qb should. We are guaranteed to see at least a few ‘hell yes’ type plays where WRs look like actual WRs. 

Bryce gets the start and keeps playing? You will have guys up for contracts extensions who can’t wait to jump ship, regardless of the $. Keep Andy and draft a guy who actually flashes ability. 

There is 0.0 to gain putting BY in. He is gone either way. What, so we might, but probably not, get his trade value up from a 6th to a 3rd? What’s to gain? There is no gain. 

This either an attempt to keep this team a complete clown show or an even more desperate by the Stans to show that they weren’t wrong. 

I agree with you except one point: Bryce’s limitations are all of the above. Physical, mental and even emotional. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Again, it’s not about making or breaking anyone’s career. I don’t get what is so hard to understand. Thielen was showing signs of irritation in the first two games of the year. It wasn’t about losing. It wasn’t about stats. It was all the times either he was open and ignored or the ball was thrown at his feet/over his head.  Any competitor wants to be given a chance to compete, whether that’s game to game or play to play, they want balls they can catch. Not for stats, for personal satisfaction. That has a huge impact on morale.  
 

and there is no “if”. I’ve long moved on from Bryce speculation, as most have. No one needs to see seven more games to confirm what is already painfully obvious. 

I can respect this opinion. I can understand your point of view. I'm just speaking for me. I wouldn't be happy if I'm getting the ball or not. I hate losing.

Edited by CamWhoaaCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The vast majority of these types of articles are speculation.  Writers have to produce content, its what they do.  Nothing real to write about, so they put out rumor they heard. Or in some cases, a rumor they started.  

Fwiw, it’s possible that they trade Bryce.  It’s possible that they keep him and don't play him.  It’s possible that they keep him and do play him. 

Yeah, I know. It is just frustrating when some of these articles titles sound like actual rumor to get you to read it and then when you do you realize that the writer has no idea and is just making stuff up. 
For some reason the media want Bryce to start again because Dalton has gotten boring. Even though if his one series against the Bears were any indication. Nothing changed and he still sucks. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

With all due respect 7 games isn't going to make or break Johnson's career. He's already a hot name in trade rumors. 

 

If Bryce is bad we simply move on. The season is already over my man.

 

Aren't you ready to move on from this Bryce speculation?

My view is that the time for speculating is long past. The evidence is clear.

And chasing your losses trying to recoup is just bad policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Y’all really let Juan/Bryce get your blood pressure up.

yeah. I admit it, it is true. Just playing him in garbage time against a prevent starts the Bryce media lobby and stan machine up again.  Had more than enough.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, strato said:

My view is that the time for speculating is long past. The evidence is clear.

And chasing your losses trying to recoup is just bad policy.

Then why are we leaving the door open to a possible return?

 

If he's not the guy make it clear. Trade him. Otherwise he's just killing whatever little value he has sitting on the bench. I'm honestly sick of seeing the lil bastard smiling on the sidelines. 

 

A real competitor would be fighting for his job. No smiles, no laughing. We are losing games nothing should be funny on the sidelines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Then why are we leaving the door open to a possible return?

 

If he's not the guy make it clear. Trade him. Otherwise he's just killing whatever little value he has sitting on the bench. I'm honestly sick of seeing the lil bastard smiling on the sidelines. 

 

A real competitor would be fighting for his job. No smiles, no laughing. We are losing games nothing should be funny on the sidelines.

It isn't 'we' afaic.

I would have no answer for it. Besides Snow's thoughts on appeasing Tepper. 

I am obviously where you are. But I'd rather see his narrow ass on the sidelines than on the field looking like a high school player that won the NFL QB for a day contest.

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Yeah, I know. It is just frustrating when some of these articles titles sound like actual rumor to get you to read it and then when you do you realize that the writer has no idea and is just making stuff up. 
For some reason the media want Bryce to start again because Dalton has gotten boring. Even though if his one series against the Bears were any indication. Nothing changed and he still sucks. 

Got it

I couldn't help but laugh when people talked Bryce in the Bears game. He threw ok in garbage time until the got in the red zone. But then he failed.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is (it is not really a question tbh), do you want to develop the young WRs and TEs, or do you want to give it another go with Bryce? These are two mutually exclusive options.

Developing WRs and TEs is the no brainer answer. Bryce is who he is, no playtime will change that, he is not part of our future.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...