Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Graziano: Panthers will trade Diontae Johnson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 10/25/2024 at 4:50 PM, frankw said:

Don't blame him one iota for feeling that way regarding that.

But he was already done before this. Never should have traded for him at this point. Fans of the Steelers who came by to talk about the trade told us what was up with Diontae.

If we flip a cb that we weren't resigning and a 6th for a 7th and a 4th and the first entertaining game in like 6 years I'd say that was a good trade

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2024 at 4:08 PM, NAS said:

All this to probably get a conditional 4th 

Or get nothing what sounds like a better option? Hmmm having two fourth rd picks which we could flip into a second or let him walk for nothing and have only one fourth rd pick it’s just logical towards Proper team building to acquire assets for players who won’t be with us next year 

On 10/25/2024 at 3:29 PM, TheSpecialJuan said:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/41999830/panthers-wrs-diontae-johnson-adam-thielen-ruled-vs-broncos

Panthers and Diontae don't want to take a chance of an injury Sunday prior to him being traded 

Smart they held out DA then traded him can’t ruin the merchandise before we sell it duhhh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

My take: Panthers are leaking all these rumors about Johnson, they want him out and are hoping another team will give them a decent draft pick 

I question how much it is us intentionally leaking or if we are just a leaky organization. That seems to have been the case the entire Tepper tenure. 

I do believe we are unhappy with him and I also believe he is unhappy with us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Morgan's strategy was to wait up until the deadline on purpose. Drive the price up for the right team that needs a replacement WR. Just about everyone else is moved and looks like Rams are keeping Kupp. 

I think the Texans just lost Stefon Diggs for the season, maybe there?

Edited by ProcessBlue2
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

I wonder if Morgan's strategy was to wait up until the deadline on purpose. Drive the price up for the right team that needs a replacement WR. Just about everyone else is moved and looks like Rams are keeping Kupp. 

I think the Texans just lost Stefon Diggs for the season, maybe there?

No  its going to happen this week probably today I would imagine.  Next week is the Germany game and I doubt they want to go through the charade of taking him with the team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

My take: Panthers are leaking all these rumors about Johnson, they want him out and are hoping another team will give them a decent draft pick 

Maybe, but leaking they aren’t happy with him would seem to hurt their bargaining position. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...