Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan is an awful GM


Joe Bear
 Share

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Joe Bear said:

I'm of the mind that he's better at drafting than he is at trading.

His best pick so far was an undrafted receiver.  The rest have shown flashes here and there but have looked really bad at times too.  They wouldn't be getting playing time on most teams.  We have to force opportunities to them over and over because the roster is devoid of much talent overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Joe Bear said:

Creating a thread for everyone to pile on the GM, since there are already plenty of them for the owner and this season's coach.

I, for one, was excited about the prospect of Morgan as the GM. I was wrong; he sucks and is doing nothing but contributing to decades-long failure, with only the faint hope of the franchise folding being the light at the end of the tunnel.

Said it over a month ago. Morgan is a moron 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so let me understand this if Baltimore wins the SuperBowl & the Panther finish with the worst record in the NFL then our 6 th & their 5th will basically be about the same pick ¿

I just don't see how anyone with any common sense whatsoever would make that type of trade ?

 

Edited by bandu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mc52beast said:

So we’re judging Morgan off of one offseason and one draft. Leggette, Coker, Wallace all look like they can contribute, could very well be others that work out. 

Morgan hasn't been bad. He can't do it all in one season. Add a couple of legit pass rushers, get back Derrick Brown, and the defense will be much better. Unfortunately, we don't have a real pass rusher on the team right now. That and no Derrick Brown. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

So we’re judging Morgan off of one offseason and one draft. Leggette, Coker, Wallace all look like they can contribute, could very well be others that work out. 

have you seen some of the players Dan Morgan passed on to draft these guys ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Morgan hasn't been bad. He can't do it all in one season. Add a couple of legit pass rushers, get back Derrick Brown, and the defense will be much better. Unfortunately, we don't have a real pass rusher on the team right now. That and no Derrick Brown. 

if you are going off his body of work and receipts hes been bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthering said:

Are we not going to give him any credit for Jalen Coker? UDFA who contributes on Sundays is an insane find. 

A lot of sources had Coker ranked as one of the top available udfa.  I wouldn't say it was a complete out of the blue choice for Morgan to make.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They also didn't mind it last year during four nations, or when they beat the fins lol. Sour grapes, they had 3 pf the top four players in the world on the ice when we beat them.
    • The tag for '26 is 28M. No way they tag him.  He is projected to be worth around 60M for 3 years so they could still try to sign him on an extension for about that amount: JagsWire   As someone else mentioned, the tag average factors in outside linebackers, aka, edge rushers, in the line backer formula.  If they would distinguish between olb and ilb, the ilb would get a lot less. 
    • He didn't actually make the playoffs. We had several opportunities to clinch on our own and crapped the bed. We had to wait for Atlanta to win to get us in. We had the tie breaker in a poo division that had 3 teams finish 8-9.  If you go back and look at the games we played, we weren't a dominant offensive team under him as an OC. We beat the Jets 13-7 and barely beat the packers after they failed to convert multiple red zone trips. We relied heavily on converting 4th downs. DC was also extremely slow at recognizing trends in game and was really lacking with clock management.  Was there progress this year? Yes. But most of it was on the defensive side of the ball. Our offense was stagnant with a couple of exceptions. Any improvement from Bryce was minimal and he kept insisting on XL over Coker, and even RB distribution instead of going with the hot hand.  He may be building something, but I don't think we've seen enough to know what that is. It could go either direction. If he insists on being OC, then without a noticeable improvement, yes he needs to be on the hot seat like any OC would. The more jobs you take on the more you have to be judged on. I think he would have a longer leash if he hired a true OC and just focused in being HC.   
×
×
  • Create New...