Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jonathan Jones: Good chance Clowney and Thielen are traded


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

I wasn’t on board with a fire sale before the Johnson trade, but once they dealt him, might as well deal em all except the few good ones. (Horn, entire OL, XL, etc) 

Not sure there is much left if you don't count horn, XL, and our oline...

I honestly wouldn't be upset if we traded away moton for good value. Already 30 and I think his play has been on the decline a bit - no point in resigning him when we are several years away from competing again 

Edited by PleaseCutStewart
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what good more 5th through 7 draft picks matter 

…only positive would be sharing of future contract salary 

I feel very badly for PSL holders, which I used to be, sitting through this poo fest

every year, I think it can’t get worse and every year, it does 

draft a prototype NFL qb with that number 1 pick and get the fug rid of Young   Seen enough of his heroics when it doesn’t matter   Get a vet in a 2 year deal and move on…I don’t care if it is Winston,   just start over 

I just don’t know about the GM draft priorities and abilities   God help the fans…if there are any left 

rest of the draft,  all defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...