Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chiefs vs Panthers


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

33 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Bryce named the starter, not shocking but it’s official. 

Not shocking like sticking your finger in a light socket. More like a dull feeling in my head after being repeatedly clubbed from behind.

This is when I feel Tepper's overbearing influence.

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mage said:

Do I think the Panthers have a much of a chance to win this game?  No.

But as someone who has bet a lot against Carolina this year... I'm very tempted to bet on the Panthers to cover that 11 point spread.  Mahomes turns the ball over a lot regardless of the defense and they are on the road against a team that is getting healthy and feeling confident.  And Jags/Lions aside, big underdogs this year have done a good job.

I agree but I wanna see that spread get bigger.  I thought the same thing and took Jacksonville +13 this past week.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, we're gonna watch, though, right?

It's going to be like watching Georgia play Thunder Valley Community College for a homecoming game, but hey, there it is.

We're going to lose the ones we are supposed to, going to win a couple that we might have been able to, and win one that we had no chance in heck of winning. This will probably not be that game.

But it'll be a good learning and evaluating game.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is promising that people are coming back from injury like Thielen and Brooks. Looks like Barno will start practicing and might play in the next few weeks. 

This game reminds me of the 2007 Indy game. Where we go on this long 18 play opening drive and score and then get blown out afterwards. 

1Q

Chiefs-10

Panthers-7

2Q

Chiefs-24

Panthers-7

3Q

Chiefs-31

Panthers-7

4Q-Final

Chiefs-34

Panthers-14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, strato said:

 

Not shocking like sticking your finger in a light socket. More like a dull feeling in my head after being repeatedly clubbed from behind.

This is when I feel Tepper's overbearing influence.

I mean, Young is the smart choice for the team, because Dalton isn't the future and the last couple games made some people wonder. Seeing Bryce play KC should silence those whispers lol. Plus it's really hard to bench a QB off two wins lol.

So Tepper may not even have needed to get involved...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've not been one to bet on games before, but I've been tempted to dip my foot in the water.  Is this the week to do it?  If so, what's the groupthink on best bet?  My gut says KC will certainly cover the spread, but the Panthers are just as likely to let me down in betting as they are on the field.  So I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Chaos said:

I've not been one to bet on games before, but I've been tempted to dip my foot in the water.  Is this the week to do it?  If so, what's the groupthink on best bet?  My gut says KC will certainly cover the spread, but the Panthers are just as likely to let me down in betting as they are on the field.  So I don't know.

Probably not.  Kansas City has been pretty suspect against the spread all year, and 11 is a lot in the NFL.  But I wouldn't advise betting on the Panthers either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chaos said:

I've not been one to bet on games before, but I've been tempted to dip my foot in the water.  Is this the week to do it?  If so, what's the groupthink on best bet?  My gut says KC will certainly cover the spread, but the Panthers are just as likely to let me down in betting as they are on the field.  So I don't know.

You also don't have to do the ML bets. You can just take KC straight up to win. Obviously the odds of them winning is higher than the odds of them winning and winning by 11 or more. So you won't make as much doing that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/17/2024 at 9:24 PM, PappyMay said:

I could see us running the ball effectively and losing by less than 10. I could also see us getting behind and having to throw and Bryce throwing 2 picks and losing by 27. Either way this forum will be happy when we move up another 2 picks in the draft.

Brooks will be getting his first playing time as a Panthers  running back and i am anxious to see how he does.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...