Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mcshay Unsure T-mac is a wr 1 or X..


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, PappyMay said:

I completely agree. If we don’t resign Tremble I’m fine taking one in round 3 or 4 to lock the position down for 2-3 years but I’d be irritated if either of our first 2 rounders were spent on TE. To me would feel like a luxury pick like last year in the 2nd.

While I would take him, Pitts at #4 overall has underperformed.  Then Atlanta takes a good RB in the first and then a QB (whose value was inflated) just after signing Cousins--I can't imagine a worst draft performance over the past 5 years even though their picks did not bust--they were just stupid from the beginning.  Atlanta was supposed to win the South and they are struggling. 

We will go defense with the first two picks.  I have been picking WR in my mocks, but after looking into it more, there might be good players on the board, but they are not the best value.  A top 10 pick should be a difference maker.  I am not an Evero fan--I think he gets outcoached a lot (like vs. Dallas), so the biggest addition we could make is the DC--I actually like the depth at edge, DT, S, RB, and LB in this draft.  Not so much CB, WR, QB, or OL.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

While I would take him, Pitts at #4 overall has underperformed.  Then Atlanta takes a good RB in the first and then a QB (whose value was inflated) just after signing Cousins--I can't imagine a worst draft performance over the past 5 years even though their picks did not bust--they were just stupid from the beginning.  Atlanta was supposed to win the South and they are struggling. 

We will go defense with the first two picks.  I have been picking WR in my mocks, but after looking into it more, there might be good players on the board, but they are not the best value.  A top 10 pick should be a difference maker.  I am not an Evero fan--I think he gets outcoached a lot (like vs. Dallas), so the biggest addition we could make is the DC--I actually like the depth at edge, DT, S, RB, and LB in this draft.  Not so much CB, WR, QB, or OL.

I just think it will be hard for us to get a better DC. Will a DC really want to join Dave Canales? Do they trust Canales will be here past next season? Will teppers alleged new hands off approach last? I do think Tepper allows us to shell out the money to hire someone, but im just not sure about our ability to get a Saleh for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

While I would take him, Pitts at #4 overall has underperformed.  Then Atlanta takes a good RB in the first and then a QB (whose value was inflated) just after signing Cousins--I can't imagine a worst draft performance over the past 5 years even though their picks did not bust--they were just stupid from the beginning.  Atlanta was supposed to win the South and they are struggling. 

Bijan hasn't had the pop he was advertised to have either.  Not bad, but he was supposed to be a game changer.  Atlanta doesn't have that bad of an offensive line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Martin said:

I haven’t seen him play, but if he doesn’t get separation and he’s slow, that doesn’t sound like a top 5 WR

On his highlights he looks great at getting seperation against lesser programs then looks like a possession reciever against decent programs.  To me he looks slow and has a long stride.  We have plenty of that on the team we need a player who can get open quick and make people miss

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jfra78 said:

On his highlights he looks great at getting seperation against lesser programs then looks like a possession reciever against decent programs.  To me he looks slow and has a long stride.  We have plenty of that on the team we need a player who can get open quick and make people miss

I agree.  I really don't like taking the same prospect archetype over and over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...