Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Garrett Wilson


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mage said:

In our situation, I wouldn't trade for him.  It will take at least a first round pick.  We would be better off pursuing Tee Higgins.

But I do think he's a very good WR.  

I can’t see them getting more than a second, especially for a disgruntled player who doesn’t want to be there anymore.  Tee Higgins will want a fat contract

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NAS said:

I can’t see them getting more than a second, especially for a disgruntled player who doesn’t want to be there anymore.  Tee Higgins will want a fat contract

Then they won't trade him IMO.  He's only 24 and still under contract, you don't trade a caliber of his player for less than 1st.  I think they get about the same value as Minnesota did for Diggs.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mage said:

Then they won't trade him IMO.  He's only 24 and still under contract, you don't trade a caliber of his player for less than 1st.  I think they get about the same value as Minnesota did for Diggs.

Difference being the Jets are a dumpster fire trash org about to completely change up front vs Vikings are a very well run franchise who had all the leverage. I don’t think they get a first for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, csx said:

No way I'm trading away a decent LT for a WR

Why would the Panthers want a playmaking WR when they have a drive killing LT? Obviously the Panthers keep the player who makes for a worse passing game.

Always take the player that will improve the offense. Panthers need to improve the QB and LT position regardless of the WR being Thielen, Coker, XL or Garrett Wilson.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just worry about it next year.  Its that simple honestly.  its way to early to do what ifs.  I could see us trade/cut chuba and retain dowdle, I could see them let dowdle walk and go with Chuba/Etienne and Brooks, and I could see Dowdle and Chuba both stay and see what happens.  Hell, we still have 6 games left THIS season plus possible post-season...what if Rico or Chuba have an ACL tear or severe injury.  I DO NOT want that to happen, but stuff like that does happen.  Remember RB is the most injury prone position in the NFL due to the beating their bodies take so having some extra guys is never bad, just wish it hadn't come at the cost we paid to get him.
    • I think it’s cool that no one can be really certain what the outcome will be.  That’s a lot of progress! This is a real opportunity for us, I’d be happy with a competitive game and thrilled if we sack up for a W.
    • I could never found out who did the first surgery. That failed.      Nor who did the recent one.    Yiu can’t count on anything involving him. If it happens it’s a windfall at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...