Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young PFF - Week 16

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, BullCityP said:

I've posted this in another thread but I will repeat it here. The sooner you accept that Bryce will be your QB1 for the next 10 or so years the better off you'll be. No matter how much crying you do on this forum isn't going to change that fact lol.  

10 years? lol.  That's funny.  Not sure Tom Brady would survive 10 years on a David Tepper team.  Tepper already showed he was cool moving on from Bryce 2 games into year 2.  Injury brought Bryce back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-Clown Mentor

X-Clown

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, CRA said:

  Tampa isn't even good.  There record is built off of beating the bottom 4th of the NFL. 

 

 

They've literally beaten the 2 best teams in the NFC (Lions, and Eagles) and have beaten two other likely playoff teams in Washington and the Chargers. What are you even talking about?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

That's on the FO. 

It is. And it doesn't matter anymore because it's a sunk cost. We can't keep him around because of his draft cost, nor should we hold it against him, imo. Yes first round rookies get more leeway than others but he still has to earn it now.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

Is there a way to show the last 5 games or something? I know Bryce was terrible vs Cowboys but he'd had good grades vs TB and KC that might offset that.

No filters for that, but give me a minute to see if I can get anything along those lines.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
countryboi Veteran

countryboi

Posted
Posted

Most quarterbacks in the league are game managers. There are maybe only 4-5 quarterbacks in the whole league who can succeed without a strong running game or with poor offensive line play.

This board seems to expect Bryce being a first pick, to perform like Joe Burrow or Josh Allen, but there are only two players like them in the world and Josh Allen didn't look like Josh Allen in his second year.

Lastly, and most importantly, this is the situation we have. It does none of us any good to complain about what Bryce isn't because, unless everything goes disastrously wrong, he is here for the foreseeable future and is highly likely to be the starting QB. You can bring in all the QBs you like, but everything is slanted towards Bryce because he was their choice at QB and because of that, they are going to give him every chance to succeed.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Is there a way to show the last 5 games or something? I know Bryce was terrible vs Cowboys but he'd had good grades vs TB and KC that might offset that.

Can't get a cumulative grade, but can get by week:

Week 16: #1
Week 15: #35
Week 14: #16
Week 13: #4
Week 12: #3

 

Since he asked for it, @Shotgun, there's Week 15. Week 14, 13, and 12 might have fuged up what you were going for though... 😜

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...