Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who here was NOT HAPPY we won yesterday....


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

So many lazy, tired-ass takes in this thread. “Tanking is for losers.” Yes, we’ve only heard that about 10,000 times. Get some new material 

Add this to the list.

You care, don't pretend you don't. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

But we’re not a winning team. We’re 4-11. To act like this win means anything is crazy. We now missed out on a blue chip player most likely since there’s only around 5 in this draft 

Uh buddy, there's a 99% chance this team wouldn't pick one of the blue chip players with the No. 1 pick. Let's enjoy a win that ruined someone else's season and leave it at that. Still picking top-2 or top-3 at worst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

But we’re not a winning team. We’re 4-11. To act like this win means anything is crazy. We now missed out on a blue chip player most likely since there’s only around 5 in this draft 

There will rarely, if ever, be a draft with only 5 “blue chippers”.  And the odds that they go 1-5 is even more unlikely.

Football is a team sport and culture means winning.  The Packers, Steelers, Vikings, Ravens, etc rarely draft high but have elite culture and identity and cultivate/train elite talent.

Bengals hit the lottery with Burrow and then Chase (and Higgins) yet their culture sucks…and it’s a matter of time before those elites want a change of scenery.

Winning and culture comes first and is the ONLY thing.

You don’t tank to succeed in the NFL.

Edited by HardcoreHokie
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
    • He had the award until like the last 8 games. He sucked ass and flagg had 3 40 point games
×
×
  • Create New...