Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who here was NOT HAPPY we won yesterday....


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Explain to me how teams like the Steelers, Bills, Chiefs, hell any team that constantly drafts in the bottom 5 of every round have maintained their dominant teams without the need to tank for a high draft picks? Seems your theory has a few holes.

Or how its always the same teams picking high.  Doesn't matter.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Tankers always mention Justin Herbert.  If only we had been one pick higher.

But the never mention that Herbert was arguably only the third best qb taken in that draft.  The best was Burrow, but number two is probably Jordan Love.  But due to some very bad analysis, Love wasn't picked until the 26th pick.  We easily could have had the second best qb that year without tanking or trading draft picks, if only predraft analysis had been better.  

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Losing is for losers. 

good teams find good players. Plenty of teams continually pick at the top of the draft and continue to suck. 

Other teams continually pick at the bottom of the draft and continue to dominate. 

The point is always to win the game. Enjoy the wins when they come. Otherwise why follow a team if only losing  makes you happy. Go root for the white Sox then

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

Explain to me how teams like the Steelers, Bills, Chiefs, hell any team that constantly drafts in the bottom 5 of every round have maintained their dominant teams without the need to tank for a high draft picks? Seems your theory has a few holes.

Because we don’t have the talented  scouts or GM the teams you mentioned have. The higher the pick, the harder it is that our incompetent scouts and GM fug it up since it’s pretty obvious who the top 5 players are in this years draft. (Hunter, Graham, Johnson, T-Mac, Carter) Take the obvious blue chip players out of the equation, it’s almost guaranteed we’ll mess it up. Hence why I want a high draft pick instead of winning a pointless game that won’t matter in the bigger picture. You might disagree, but that doesn’t make you right just because other posters give you made up “Pie” 

Edited by flagfootballcoach28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Because we don’t have the talented  scouts or GM the teams you mentioned have. The higher the pick, the harder it is that our incompetent scouts and GM fug it up since it’s pretty obvious who the top 5 players are in this years draft. (Hunter, Graham, Johnson, T-Mac, Carter) Take the obvious blue chip players out of the equation, it’s almost guaranteed we’ll mess it up. Hence why I want a high draft pick instead of winning a pointless game that won’t matter in the bigger picture. You might disagree, but that doesn’t make you right just because other posters give you made up “Pie” 

Oh yes, don't have talented scouts. 

Good argument. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Then give me a rebuttal instead of being a condescending asswipe 

Alright. 

Scouts are scouts. They travel. They evaluate.  They report back.  This isn't rocket science. Although people constantly want to blame scouts. Really?  It's grasping at straws. That's what it is. 

Damn right I wipe my ass. With wet wipes, because I can't stand a dirty ass. You don't have that problem though, as poo just falls out of your mouth. ..

 

Thanks for elementary school banter tonight.  

Edited by pantherclaw
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Alright. 

Scouts are scouts. They travel. They evaluate.  They report back.  This isn't rocket science. Although people constantly want to blame scouts. Really?  It's grasping at straws. That's what it is. 

Damn right I wipe my ass. With wet wipes, because I can't stand a dirty ass. You don't have that problem though, as poo just falls out of your mouth. ..

 

Thanks for elementary school banter tonight.  

I said our scouts and GM. 

Here’s our last 2 drafts

2023

1st. Bryce Young (jury is still out, picked the worst of the 2 QB’s being considered) Seen as a horrible trade up by 99% of people  

2nd. Mingo- Bust

3rd. DJ Johnson- Bust

4th. Zavala- Bust

5th. Jammie Robinson- Bust

2024

1. Legette- Stone hands. High chance of a bust  Offense looked MUCH better without him. Journeyman David Moore was an upgrade. Could’ve had Ladd

2. Brooks- just lol Bust. could’ve had Dejean  imagine drafting a RB coming of an ACL who’s not even a generational talent? We did  

3. Trevin Wallace- looked horrible this year. UDFA LB’s playing better than him  

4. J Sanders- Mehh. Tremble has been outplaying him lately  

5. Wade- Mehh

6. Crumedy- who?

7. Barrett- cut
 

Makes sense you use wet wipes because you’re full of so much shiitt your dirty ass is too much for regular toilet paper to handle, old man. Look at our last two drafts and try and convince me our scouts and past two gm’s have been competent? lol. Hope you’re still enjoying that 4th win though!!!! 4-11 baby! Fug yeah!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by flagfootballcoach28
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

I said our scouts and GM. 

Here’s our last 2 drafts

2023

1st. Bryce Young (jury is still out, picked the worst of the 2 QB’s being considered) Seen as a horrible trade up by 99% of people  

2nd. Mingo- Bust

3rd. DJ Johnson- Bust

4th. Zavala- Bust

5th. Jammie Robinson- Bust

2024

1. Legette- Stone hands. High chance of a bust  Offense looked MUCH better without him. Journeyman David Moore was an upgrade. Could’ve had Ladd

2. Brooks- just lol Bust. could’ve had Dejean  imagine drafting a RB coming of an ACL who’s not even a generational talent? We did  

3. Trevin Wallace- looked horrible this year. UDFA LB’s playing better than him  

4. J Sanders- Mehh. Tremble has been outplaying him lately  

5. Wade- Mehh

6. Crumedy- who?

7. Barrett- cut
 

Makes sense you use wet wipes because you’re full of so much shiitt your dirty ass is too much for regular toilet paper to handle, old man. Look at our last two drafts and try and convince me our scouts and past two gm’s have been competent? lol. Hope you’re still enjoying that 4th win though!!!! 4-11 baby! Fug yeah!

 

 

 

 

 

 

This guy is clueless 🙈 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, csx said:

This guy is clueless 🙈 

I knew that when he said Barrett was cut. Traded for Jackson who has been a steal for what we gave up. 
 

while I do agree Ladd and Dejean would have been a better combo ,hind sight is always 20/20. Trevin has shown flashes and Chau will be our nickel next year. Sanders will be the starting TE and XL will be WR. Having 4 guys start in year two isn’t the worst draft. Could it of been better absolutely. Let’s just not blow our 2nd rounder this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...