Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just a reminder...


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm shocked that the Vikings actually fixed Darnold. It's gonna be interesting to see what they do moving forward having drafted McCarthy in the 1st this past draft.

He has probably the best set up of any QB in the league, but good for him, he seems like a really good guys.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Martin said:

He has probably the best set up of any QB in the league, but good for him, he seems like a really good guys.

This. Hated the trade for him and wanted no part of him here to be honest but always liked the person. Seems like a legitimately good guy and I'm happy to see him having success. It's been a long road for him. Says a lot about him for hanging in there.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm shocked that the Vikings actually fixed Darnold. It's gonna be interesting to see what they do moving forward having drafted McCarthy in the 1st this past draft.

It's a very good combination of factors.  O'Connell is proving to be one of the best coaches in the league, JJ and Addison the best duo, and Darnold is starting to avoid the dummy throws.  It's coming together there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm shocked that the Vikings actually fixed Darnold. It's gonna be interesting to see what they do moving forward having drafted McCarthy in the 1st this past draft.

Having Jefferson, Addison, hockenson, Jones, and a much better oline will help just about any QB over Moore, a worse Hubbard, and a bunch of turds at oline and the rest of the receiver positions...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Manna said:

They were trash when they were with us. Getting cut by a struggling franchise were their wake-up call and they got their act together. We didn’t give up on anything. 

They were their worst versions of themselves because of us.  We keep creating new problems and laying the blame at the wrong places.   We had coaching issues.  Personal issues.  We blamed the QB.  Now we got a QB issue.  We blamed Frank.  Eventually we likely blame Canales. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a completely green Joe Brady under Matt Rhule for Darnold who managed to look good for a minute, starting off 3-0.  If we could've set that up with a better coaching situation, I think he'd still be our QB.

For Baker, we gave him a hot seated Matt Rhule testing out McAdoo as his first refuge outside of Cleveland.  Complete disaster of an environment.  

All stems back to the Matt Rhule hiring...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Justin Jefferson fixed Cousins and

4 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Having Jefferson, Addison, hockenson, Jones, and a much better oline will help just about any QB over Moore, a worse Hubbard, and a bunch of turds at oline and the rest of the receiver positions...

cousins saw a huge production step change when Jefferson came, even their bum backups last year put up numbers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...