Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young Stats Through 2 Years


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

 ((((CAREER STATS AFTER YEAR 2))))

6 Wins - 22 Losses (21% win rate)   (as a starting QB) 

- 5280 passing yards, 60.3% Completion rate, 28 TD, 19 INTs 
- 82 rushes, 502 rushing yards 6 rushing TDs , 6.1 ypc

(((CAREER STATS AFTER YEAR 1)))

2 Wins - 14 Losses  (12.5% win rate) 

- 2877 passing yards, 59.8% Completion rate,  11 TDs, 10 INTs 

- 253 rushing yards, 0 TDs, 6.5 ypc 

 

Some things I've noticed. His completion percentage hasn't changed much which is interesting. Its good to see that TD  to INT Ratio get a little better.  

All 6 of the rushing TDs came from year 2. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most important thing to me

In his last 8 games, three interceptions.  And 2 of those came in one game.  And during those games, he was throwing the ball down the field more.  Four game winning drives in those 8 games.  And a couple of others, he lead drives that might have won the game had others done their jobs.  The kid has been money in close games.  

These are the things that make winning qb's imo.  Don't get me wrong, he still has some areas he needs to improve upon.  But I feel much better than I did after the Chargers game.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Imagine using Peyton Mannings and Josh Allen’s rookie season to define them.

Yeah, you just use their careers. Everything.  
 

We are only allowed to talk about Bryce through the lense of like 4 games

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Tbe said:

IMG_0758.jpeg

4-6 since Bryce came back, should have been at least 5-5 or even 6-4 if not for a couple of plays.  (Chuba fumble vs TB,  XL drop vs Eagles). The positive momentum despite historically bad defense is undeniable 

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, CRA said:

Yeah, you just use their careers. Everything.  
 

We are only allowed to talk about Bryce through the lense of like 4 games

I'm hoping at midseason next year you'll be saying "yeah but we're only allowed to talk about Bryce through the lense of 12 games"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yall gotta stop being dishonest with yourselves. When he has the ball in his hands he is trustworthy. He’s delivered multiple game winning drives that would be W’s if not for this ass defense. 
 

Bryce has already outclutched Delhomme. He’s easily the best QB we’ve had since Cam God Newton. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Yall gotta stop being dishonest with yourselves. When he has the ball in his hands he is trustworthy. He’s delivered multiple game winning drives that would be W’s if not for this ass defense. 
 

Bryce has already outclutched Delhomme. He’s easily the best QB we’ve had since Cam God Newton. 

This is why Bryce is perceived by some to have more haters than he does….because the folks super high on Bryce take it too far over and over and we can’t resist addressing it. 

Bryce Young has not already out clutched Jake Delhomme.  Adding today as a GW drive….Bryce has 6 GW drives in 28 starts.  Which hasn’t even caught him up to Jake’s 2003 seasons worth of GW drives.   

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CRA said:

This is why Bryce is perceived by some to have more haters than he does….because the folks super high on Bryce take it too far over and over and we can’t resist addressing it. 

Bryce Young has not already out clutched Jake Delhomme.  Adding today as a GW drive….Bryce has 6 GW drives in 28 starts.  Which hasn’t even caught him up to Jake’s 2003 seasons worth of GW drives.   

You can’t be serious CRA. The 03 defense is an all time defense. Bryce Young on the 08 squad takes them to the Super Bowl. Delhomme had a legitimate two year stretch as a standout QB. But he never really had it between the ears. He just had the arm talent to force throws he had no business making. Tommy John destroyed him. 
 

 

Thats why the 08/09 playoff game was so awful. It is exposed Jake for who he really was . Had Fox had any god damn sense he would have made the 08 season an open competition between Delhomme and Matt Moore, and Moore would have taken us farther. Because he was the smarter QB and had the better arm.

Edited by OneBadCat
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
×
×
  • Create New...