Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs


 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

WOW, way too much time left for Buffalo, and if they score, there won't be much left for KC

actually, Buffalo hasn't struggled to score on offense this year. What THEY have to be careful about is leaving any time left on the clock when they do score. Because that is a death sentence vs the Chiefs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

Again, neither ref could actually see the ball

The ref who would have been facing the ball was 100% blocked out of view by all the big linemen, as there was a camera down the line that was like 10 feet in the air and we couldn't even see the ball there because of all the players, no ref standing on the field was seeing it when we couldn't.

Again, so why should the ref who had a view of Allen’s back get the benefit to overrule the other? If either did see the ball, which one would it have been?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bama Panther said:

Again, so why should the ref who had a view of Allen’s back get the benefit to overrule the other? If either did see the ball, which one would it have been?

you keep saying "overrule" but that's a woefully inaccurate term when neither one was "overruling" the other.

What does seeing Allen's face vs back have any bearing on it, neither view helps you determine where the ball is in relation to the line to gain.

It's the same way all ball spots happen, the first ref to be given the ball is the one who spots it, if you have a problem with that, take it up with how the game is officiated, but there was nothing nefarious here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

or, you know, they made the call they thought they saw on the field

Just because it went one way, doesn't mean there was bias involved, not everything is some big conspiracy theory

so they both saw it, and didn't see it

lmao ok dude, no changing your mind

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm salty every time I see someones mid picks become stars while we throw first and second rounders over and over and they all stink outside of Tet (who still has a lot to prove, imo)
    • There is a contingent that is total Bryce but they weathervane with the wind. When the good Bryce wind blows about once or twice a month we hear a lot from them. But they are always pro Bryce, they just don’t pipe up too much when he sucks. I can’t speak for them, as far as what they are looking at.    In a second contingent, the collective mind is made up. He has had had basically three years worth of starts that might include a top tier outing or two, a few second tier outings, offset by about the same number of bottom tier outings which actually may have the edge there.  The rest of his stuff is third tier and that is going to be the bulk of his starts. We want to move on. And we aren’t getting off of that hill until he puts us off of it. He has not.    There is a third contingent that has no conviction and definitely weather vanes. Bryce is good. Bryce isn’t good. Depending on the latest game. They will buy into 7 on 7 success so that should tell you something. 
    • Nacua is really fuging good. He might be a better version of Cooper Kupp.
×
×
  • Create New...