Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales and Young


Recommended Posts

If Bryce gets some continuity with Dave over the next few years, I think he can approach his ceiling as a Drew Brees type. Brees got the ball out quick and had elite accuracy. Bryce has that capability. He made great strides this year, and finding his comfort zone is going to enable the fast processing he was known for coming into the NFL. 
 

It’s nice to feel like we have a head coach who can get the most out of their players for a change. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a fair point. I'm glad Canales is also adaptable in his decision-making. Miles Sanders convinced him to run the ball on first and goal against Atlanta, and it resulted in the walk-off TD. If it's a pass, sure, there's every chance Young ends up running it in -- but there's also the greater possibility of a holding penalty or a turnover.

It wasn't a smart call at first, but his relenting was wise and it showed a quality few NFL coaches have: the willingness to consider their first opinion isn't the gospel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Joe Bear said:

This is a fair point. I'm glad Canales is also adaptable in his decision-making. Miles Sanders convinced him to run the ball on first and goal against Atlanta, and it resulted in the walk-off TD. If it's a pass, sure, there's every chance Young ends up running it in -- but there's also the greater possibility of a holding penalty or a turnover.

It wasn't a smart call at first, but his relenting was wise and it showed a quality few NFL coaches have: the willingness to consider their first opinion isn't the gospel.

Sanders just wanted the TD, a run play on first and goal from the 1 is never a bad call. 

I do like what Canales was able to do with Young though, he was just a few games from being gone and he completely turned him around. 

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a pundit on a podcast who said that when we went on the close game run with a win here and there that Canales was "calling plays out of his mind". There were really some good wrinkles and some players being schemed open. I am excited to see what happens as personnel gets more experienced and we add some pieces. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a personality standpoint, Young and Canales seem to be a good pairing. There aren't too many coaches who could bench a guy and yet keep that guy's trust in you. 

Absolutely they're nowhere close to Mahomes/Reid, but in the Atlanta game, some of Canales's playcalls were about as bold as his QB was. A good sign Canales himself is gaining the confidence to call what he wants without worrying too much whether his players could execute. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jackofalltrades said:

I'm excited about the possibilities with them moving forward. My concern now is to see how they adjust to the league having a bunch of film, will they be able to stay ahead of the curb?

That's a true sign of a good coach. Making those halftime adjustments. We haven't had a OC that adjusted well since Dan Henning. 

I also think Canales got better with his play calling as time went by.  It was refreshing to see misdirection and other non stardard plays. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

That's a true sign of a good coach. Making those halftime adjustments. We haven't had a OC that adjusted well since Dan Henning. 

I also think Canales got better with his play calling as time went by.  It was refreshing to see misdirection and other non stardard plays. 

That should be expected as he learns strength's, preferences, tendencies, etc.; but a lot of that is evident on game tape too. So we'll see how the offense evolves. Another pitfall is letting the pendulum swing too far and you over adjust and get too complex. It's a delicate balance for sure.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...