Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

r/NFL Top 50 WR rankings.


ECHornet
 Share

Recommended Posts

Top 50 WRs by r/NFL

Zero Panthers appeared on the list. If distributed equally, each team in the NFL would have at least 1 and ~half the teams would have 2 on the list. We had zero.

Now, we do have two of our top 3 WRs entering their sophomore years, and Theilen is probably not getting proper respect as he nears the end of his career. Still, it’s hard to argue that our WR room currently ranks around bottom 5 in the league. 
 

If you’re in Dan Morgan’s shoes, what’s your plan to improve our WR room while not neglecting our needs on defense?

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Top 50 WRs by r/NFL

Zero Panthers appeared on the list. If distributed equally, each team in the NFL would have at least 1 and ~half the teams would have 2 on the list. We had zero.

Now, we do have two of our top 3 WRs entering their sophomore years, and Theilen is probably not getting proper respect as he nears the end of his career. Still, it’s hard to argue that our WR room currently ranks around bottom 5 in the league. 
 

If you’re in Dan Morgan’s shoes, what’s your plan to improve our WR room while not neglecting our needs on defense?

 

Draft BPA.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Draft BPA.

So no necessary need to touch the WR room this year?

I’m not opposed to that. We need to see what we have in XL and Coker. My hope is at minimum one of those two proves they’re a capable WR2 for the 5+ years. Worst case scenario is both show as WR3 or less this year, and we have to completely remake the room in 2026.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

So no necessary need to touch the WR room this year?

I’m not opposed to that. We need to see what we have in XL and Coker. My hope is at minimum one of those two proves they’re a capable WR2 for the 5+ years. Worst case scenario is both show as WR3 or less this year, and we have to completely remake the room in 2026.  

There will be guys available in the top 60 of the draft that can help. You never know, perhaps McMillian drops to 8 and the matter takes care of itself.

Or make a good FA signing(more likely).

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ECHornet said:

So no necessary need to touch the WR room this year?

I’m not opposed to that. We need to see what we have in XL and Coker. My hope is at minimum one of those two proves they’re a capable WR2 for the 5+ years. Worst case scenario is both show as WR3 or less this year, and we have to completely remake the room in 2026.  

I don't believe in XL and I still don't want to reach on wr at 8.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

There will be guys available in the top 60 of the draft that can help. You never know, perhaps McMillian drops to 8 and the matter takes care of itself.

Or make a good FA signing(more likely).

 

So you do see the light!!! T21 wore you out admitted it!!!

This is why I feel Tmac is the best choice for the Panthers.

Cause at 57, 82, 102 etc, No WR will be close to Tmacs level of impact. But there will be starting level DLmen into the 4th round this year(*should)

Panthers don't need #4 or #3 or #5 they need a #1 or at least #2. That's only available at 8. 

FA this year is bad, no #1 or 2s. Higgins is already tagged and he's a great #2. Unless trade happens, the best and only method is draft. That means using that 8th on Tmac. 

Go Crazy Wtf GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You don't make a team better making desperate moves based on need. The desperate move we made to get Bryce shows up when you looks across the roster.

And the desperate moves of using the 39th and 32nd picks on wr's the last two years.  Our wr room is not has bad as our D and we need to see what X and Coker do year two as you suggested. We can get a wr later. This is really a trade back if you can draft and take a lot of defensive players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

 

So you do see the light!!! T21 wore you out admitted it!!!

This is why I feel Tmac is the best choice for the Panthers.

Cause at 57, 82, 102 etc, No WR will be close to Tmacs level of impact. But there will be starting level DLmen into the 4th round this year(*should)

Panthers don't need #4 or #3 or #5 they need a #1 or at least #2. That's only available at 8. 

FA this year is bad, no #1 or 2s. Higgins is already tagged and he's a great #2. Unless trade happens, the best and only method is draft. That means using that 8th on Tmac. 

Go Crazy Wtf GIF

I have been saying if McMillian was there at 8 I would take him for weeks.

Higgins is the better option but he really has little reason to want to come here unless we are willing to outbid the entire rest of the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You don't make a team better making desperate moves based on need. The desperate move we made to get Bryce shows up when you looks across the roster.


This Up Here GIF by Chord Overstreet
 

One thing Dave Gettleman said that will stick with me forever is “don’t shop hungry”.  That is a sound philosophy. 
 

I think shortly thereafter he exiled Josh Norman, panicked and drafted three corners, two of which were irrelevant and I forget their names but the philosophy is sound nonetheless. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...