Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trading With Chicago


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think Chicago will be a good canidate to trade with as I think they share similar draft interests with New Orleans.  Chicago probably wants Oline for Johnsons new offense.  Saints need Oline as well.  If Campbell is there, trade could be made.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, chknwing said:

I think Chicago will be a good canidate to trade with as I think they share similar draft interests with New Orleans.  Chicago probably wants Oline for Johnsons new offense.  Saints need Oline as well.  If Campbell is there, trade could be made.  

bears, fins, and colts are all good spots to pick up a 2nd, and still pick before the falcons 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Greg Olsen says hello. 

That was when I think all of us had considerably more faith in the FO we have.

If you look at recent trades with the Bears, they have "won" every one of them.

Be wary if they call, it's likely to lead to a dry fuging for us.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

That was when I think all of us had considerably more faith in the FO we have.

If you look at recent trades with the Bears, they have "won" every one of them.

Be wary if they call, it's likely to lead to a dry fuging for us.

We had more faith in a Hurney led FO than the current one!?!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, La Pantera said:

We had more faith in a Hurney led FO than the current one!?!?

He did work in the front office that assembled two SB teams.  For all Gettleman's bluster, the core of that team was Hurney picks.

So yea, until the current regime proves that it can build a winner, Hurney's FO was the best we've ever had.  Take that however you like.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, La Pantera said:

We had more faith in a Hurney led FO than the current one!?!?

God yes. That's how bad this is.

It ain't praise of Marty by any stretch, it's just how terrible these Tepper years have been. 

I mean, literally look at the 2018-2020 drafts. They are definitively better than any draft since. And those 18-20 drafts ain't exactly something to write home about.

If you had told me in 2016/2017 during the height of the Gettleman vs. Hurney Worst GM fights in here that we would have successive GM's that said, "Hold my, beer" I would have said you are nuts.

But...here we are.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

God yes. That's how bad this is.

It ain't praise of Marty by any stretch, it's just how terrible these Tepper years have been. 

I mean, literally look at the 2018-2020 drafts. They are definitively better than any draft since. And those 18-20 drafts ain't exactly something to write home about.

If you had told me in 2016/2017 during the height of the Gettleman vs. Hurney Worst GM fights in here that we would have successive GM's that said, "Hold my, beer" I would have said you are nuts.

But...here we are.

 

1 hour ago, Camp Fodder said:

Season 2 Nbc GIF by The Office

 

1 hour ago, CBDellinger said:

Hurney is undeniably the Panthers GOAT GM.

Drafted Cam, Luke, Pep, TD etc and traded a damn third rounder via fax for 3rd Leg Greg.  Legend!

All I’ll say is that everyone wanted Hurney gone long before it actually happened. And literally nobody wanted him back the second time.

He missed far more than he hit in the draft. Outside of the first. He was completely garbage at FA.

our current FO is still a virtual unknown, after one season.But they did give us one of better FA groups we’ve seen in a loooong time. We won’t know how the first draft class will turn out until year 2 is over. really biggest knock, was taking an injured RB. Who we all know Hurney would’ve drafted as well. Hell he may have traded into the first to get him…

Give me the unknown commodity vs the 100% garbage one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, La Pantera said:

 

 

All I’ll say is that everyone wanted Hurney gone long before it actually happened. And literally nobody wanted him back the second time.

He missed far more than he hit in the draft. Outside of the first. He was completely garbage at FA.

our current FO is still a virtual unknown, after one season.But they did give us one of better FA groups we’ve seen in a loooong time. We won’t know how the first draft class will turn out until year 2 is over. really biggest knock, was taking an injured RB. Who we all know Hurney would’ve drafted as well. Hell he may have traded into the first to get him…

Give me the unknown commodity vs the 100% garbage one.

Minus the above average FA class(you are forgetting a LOT of whiffs, BTW) his draft was prime Fitterer.

I would say after year one he is worse than both Gettleman and Hurney. But, super small sample size. Maybe it will get better.

We better fuging hope it does....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...