Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defensive Line will be stronger at....


Zod

Defensive Line will be stronger at...  

70 members have voted

  1. 1. Defensive Line will be stronger at...

    • Run Stuffing
      9
    • Pass Rushing
      45
    • Neither, they will be horrid
      16


Recommended Posts

We will have a pretty formidable pass rush thanks to Everette Brown, Greg Hardy and, perhaps most importantly, Charles "Country Strong" Johnson. The run defense won't be as bad as most people think.

I don't think this year's defense will look all that unlike last year's.

i love the confidence i really do, and i hope your right. it is like i posted in another thread, this is a very talented team. our whole season lies on the shoulders of this d-line. i know everyone is excited about the training camp battles between the WR, QB, OL, and LB. but the most important battle is on the d-line.

I have faith in Leonard (who i really like) and Johnson, but Brown and Tyler are going to need to step up and prove me wrong. I like Brayton a lot but he is no game changer and we are in trouble if he is our most consistent player on the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually think the run defense will be improved this year if a few things happen.

Meeks needs to coach DEs to first hold the edge and then when it is clearly pass, go for the quarterback instead of rush headlong for the QB and allow big runs on the edge in the spot where the DE vacated.

The DT tackles need to play well at limiting the runs up the middle so the DEs don't always pinch in and the linebackers don't have to run blitz all the time instead of read and react. It again caused the DEs to get caught inside and teams could run wide last year any time they wanted.

And obviously we don't sustain a bunch of injuries.

The pass rush will be helped by more of a cover 1 man under scheme. Hopefully we go to that right off the bat instead of waiting for half the year to be over while teams gash our cover 2 zone. We need too be solid in the secondary in order to allow the line time to penetrate. Otherwise we will have to blitz more than we want. We have greater speed than we have ever had before and need to use it to our advantage.

Overall assessment- the run defense will be improved this year over last. The pass rush will develop over time but will not be great early. As the secondary and linebacker core gels, the line looks better and gets more sacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...