Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tershawn Wharton to sign with Panthers


Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Like I said, hopefully he was just a late bloomer but sudden jumps in production in contract years rarely hold up in future years.

I'm just saying I wouldn't consider it a late bloomer being an URFA originaly you give first rounders 3 years supposably 4 for a undrafted guy not seeing many snaps originaly isn't late to me.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Navy_football said:

Agree. But 300+ pounds defenders should not be playing every snap. It was just a matter of time before he got injured. 

I don't think that had much to do with his injury tbh first quarter of the year he had played like 2 quarters including pre season in 7 months 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carolina Panthers Primary LogoCARDefensive Tackle#98

Panthers agreed to terms with DT Tershawn Wharton, formerly of the Chiefs, on a three-year contract.
According to FOX NFL’s Jordan Schultz, the deal is worth over $54 million, though we don’t have the full details yet. Wharton appeared in all 17 games for the Chiefs and totaled 6.5 sacks plus seven TFLs. He added two sacks and a TFL to that tally during Kansas City’s run to the Super Bowl. Wharton never ascended to an every-down role with the Chiefs but will have the opportunity to do so in Carolina. The Panthers have been aggressive in fixing their defense early in free agency, signing multiple defensive linemen on top of other key moves.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

I'm just saying I wouldn't consider it a late bloomer being an URFA originaly you give first rounders 3 years supposably 4 for a undrafted guy not seeing many snaps originaly isn't late to me.

Man I hope you're right. That would be a lot of cash for a couple more Shy Tuttles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

seems like a more prudent approach than paying DK 30 million per.  But fug man I hope this doesnt screw up our cap situation, we were so fuging close to having some actual breathing room with no poo deals.  But if a couple of these guys get sideways we have a lot of money on the books

I understand and definitely haven't forgotten our mismanagement of the cap it's become a Panthers tradition. At the same time this all still hinges on Morgan's ability to draft well either way. Let's just hope Tillis involvement in the process is a big help.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Cool. Just Hella risky. That's all. Hella risky. A lot of guys catch lightening in a bottle for one season and NEVER get close to that kind of production again. Never.

Due to our shitty drafting Morgan has to throw more darts at the board, albeit they are expensive darts but he has to be hoping 2 hit or more hit.  I wish we could get into a spot where its reversed and we are not signing guys on need but luxury

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce Young has recorded 4 game-winning drives through nine weeks, leading the Carolina Panthers to crucial victories in tight contests. The 12-play, 58-yard clock-killer versus the Packers in Week 9 (16-13 upset). This pace positions him as the team's most clutch performer in years, with a 68.4% success rate on go-ahead drivesalready surpassing many franchise benchmarks early in his career.   Young's early 2025 surge (top-5 league-wide in clutch EPA at 0.28 per dropback) not only outstrips the debuts of Newton (2 in 2011) and Delhomme (1 in 2003) but hints at him climbing this list quickly if the Panthers sustain their wildcard hunt. Data underscores his growth: no other Panther QB hit 4 GWDs before Week 10 in a season.   The energy fans pour into the stadium directly shapes Bryce Young’s performance positive support has been shown to elevate his fourth-quarter efficiency by 12%, strengthening team cohesion and execution under pressure. Criticizing or booing the starting quarterback fractures morale, disrupts focus, and undermines the very resilience needed in clutch moments. When fans stand firmly behind their QB and team, they become a true home-field advantage, amplifying performance and accelerating the path to sustained success. Now are you a Carolina Panther fan or a Panther hater? 
    • Bryce would have extended some plays scrambling with his legs but then again he also has a high number of fumbles so you never know what you're going to get and the way the Bills were getting after Andy (sacked 7 times) it stands to reason Bryce would have been under duress often. What exactly do you want here? I mean I'm going to go by the gameplan I saw after Bryce turned the ball over against GB. Clearly Dave Canales was deliberately trying to limit the opportunities for him to make a catastrophic mistake. And didn't Micah Parsons log zero QB pressures? So with that in mind if you are asking for anyone to argue our offense with Bryce would have had much if any success against that opportunistic motivated Bills defense while we were also splitting carries between Rico and Chuba who had the majority of them which ended up being a situation resulting in a weeks worth of scathing criticism and deservedly so then I'm going to just have to say we can agree to disagree.
×
×
  • Create New...