Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verge, why do you like Mykel Williams?


 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Mykel seems like a fairly low ceiling and VERY low floor guy. Outside of the measureables, he very much looks like he is on the Shemar Stewart end of the scale. 

I would be very disappointed to see him taken at 8. Late 1st, early 2nd I can understand.

I'd say his ceiling is pretty high.  When I think of low ceiling, I think of limited traits which I don't see with him.  With that said I don't want to draft a project at 8.  If we trade down and get a decent return I'm good with drafting him later.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

I keep thinking about Charles Johnson and Greg Hardy--both emerged in year 3.  However, they are expendable, and if your line chart is not trending upwards, you are sitting still or falling behind.   They have not been that bad when they play, but we need a difference maker.

Barno needs to be replaced this season and will be unless he's a special teams ace. He has no value on defense. Johnson is in the same boat. If they take an edge rusher or 2 then those guys are gone after cuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Barno needs to be replaced this season and will be unless he's a special teams ace. He has no value on defense. Johnson is in the same boat. If they take an edge rusher or 2 then those guys are gone after cuts.

And you have to think of roster spots--When I was in college the coach said, "This is the depth chart.  Look at it closely--some will be happy, some will be upset.  Understand that by the end of the season, this will look totally different.  So save this until December, and compare it to the depth chart then."  So I tend to think of the bottom of the roster that way--does a player show that he is trying to become a starter?  I did see it in Johnson a bit and in Hardy a lot.  I am not seeing it with these guys. 

I also consider the fact that Clowney will be gone in 2026 and Wonnum will not be under contract.   We have Jones for two years.  So if we add an edge in 2025 and again in 2026, we should be fine.  That is why part of me wants to take our time and see if anything materializes, but I just don't see it.  I have more faith in Barno, fwiw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Barno needs to be replaced this season and will be unless he's a special teams ace. He has no value on defense. Johnson is in the same boat. If they take an edge rusher or 2 then those guys are gone after cuts.

Barno is the original Shemar Stewart. Incredible measurables and no production to show for it. I wish we would try some other things with him to try to make use of his speed, but if he's not able to contribute it really is time to cut his ass.

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thin

1 minute ago, rodeo said:

Barno is the original Shemar Stewart. Incredible measurables and no production to show for it. I wish we would try some other things with him to try to make use of his speed, but if he's not able to contribute it really is time to cut his ass.

Good comparison--But Barno was a sixth rounder---so Shemar is much riskier, which illustrates your point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, rodeo said:

Barno is the original Shemar Stewart. Incredible measurables and no production to show for it. I wish we would try some other things with him to try to make use of his speed, but if he's not able to contribute it really is time to cut his ass.

BINGO

Stewart and his "UDFA just hoping he can land a camp invite" production being talked about as a potential top 10 pick is fuging wild. I know this draft is being perceived as light on top shelf talent but c'mon...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

I'd say his ceiling is pretty high.  When I think of low ceiling, I think of limited traits which I don't see with him.  With that said I don't want to draft a project at 8.  If we trade down and get a decent return I'm good with drafting him later.

Yeah, I can see him potentially being really good but I think he's more likely to be an underwhelming disappointment. Maybe not an outright bust but just meh. Like if we took this guy on the third round, yay. But top 10? Damn...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I keep thinking about Charles Johnson and Greg Hardy--both emerged in year 3.  However, they are expendable, and if your line chart is not trending upwards, you are sitting still or falling behind.   They have not been that bad when they play, but we need a difference maker.

Barno needs to stay healthy and he can be a Mario Addison, Al Wallace-type second-teamer.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Joe Bear said:

Barno needs to stay healthy and he can be a Mario Addison, Al Wallace-type second-teamer.

I've hoped that for a long time now. I don't think there's much to see here. Sadly. I'd love to be proven wrong by the guy, though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

I've hoped that for a long time now. I don't think there's much to see here. Sadly. I'd love to be proven wrong by the guy, though.

 

I haven't forgotten the splash plays he made when subbing for Brian Burns, or the fact he was one of two guys on defense who played well the last game I attended.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

I get what you're saying but his pass rush win rate is terrible.  I get that our run defense and defense in general was awful last year, but leave it to Dan Morgan to sell out to build a defense entirely around stopping the run in the modern nfl.

Pretty good plan imo considering the following RBs on the schedule:

  • Bijan Robinson (x2)
  • Alvin Kamara (x2)
  • Bucky Irving (x2)
  • Christian McCaffrey
  • Josh Jacobs
  • Kyren Williams
  • James Connor
  • Breece Hall

Plus there's back ups like Jets'  Braelon Allen, heavy rushing attacks like the Bills, and teams with an entire stable of backs like the Seahawks to account for. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I would say that the majority of Huddlers do not want Stewart or Williams.  Is that a fair statement?  We will have better safeties who are dawgs in run support, hopefully better LB play, much better DLinemen, and our CBs are good tacklers.

This player needs to be a beast who can get to the QB.  Let the other guys play the run--see ball, get ball.

The problem with drafting a DE/EDGE high in the 1st is the bust factor.  That position group busts at a scary rate.  We HAVE to hit our first 3 rounds.  Cant take chances on tweeners or potential guys.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...