Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speculation from Twitter


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You mentioned tight end visits. I mentioned one that just came through. 

Had nothing to do with Warren.

Christ dude you are losing it.  I was responding the the poster that said he wanted warren, I said we havent brought him in yet but have brought in other tight ends, therefor its highly unlikely we are drafting warren.  Thats pretty linear and not that hard to follow

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Cam Jordan was on Good Morning Football.  A player like Cam (lifelong Saint and a great ambassador for any team--I like him a lot) could be used by the Saints to create a smokescreen.  He denied that the Saints would take a QB in the first round, claiming that it has not been done since Manning in 1971 (paraphrasing)... It seems to me, (conspiracy theory forthcoming) that bit of information would have to have been researched/premeditated/planned.  Was he attempting to scoff at the concept that the Saints would draft a QB at #10?  Remember, Carr missed 7 games last year and had a 63.something QB rating.  He was not believed to be returning in 2025.  When the Saints thought that one of the top 2 Qbs were not going to be there at #10, they did not take advantage of the void clause in his contract, the way I understand it.  That means they continued to kick the Carr contract down the road.  In 2026, Carr's cap number is $69m--nearly a quarter of the cap for a 35-year old QB they do not want.  He is to be paid a $40m salary with a $10m roster bonus. While I am not a capologist, it is interesting if they really like Shedeur. All that matters is the perception that the Saints will take him at 10.

If the Giants pass on him, and I think they likely will, Sanders could draw interest from the Raiders (I do not see it) at 6 or the Jets at 7 (more likely, but still unlikely).  The Panthers are the most likely trade partner--unless the Jets want to move back.  So who may realistically trade up for a qb?  The Colts (14), but there is no noise about them taking a QB and I do not think they have shown interest--instead, a competition between Richardson and Jones is the plan.  The Steelers (21) are in play, and the Rams are in play.  There is, however, another option for Carolina as a trade partner--The Saints.  A draft day switch for a third rounder might keep the Panthers targeting their player at 8 and add a pick in the process, suggesting they do not want to move back--but I get the impression that the Panthers are looking to move back.

 

That's a double win.  Picking up an extra 3rd and sticking them with Sanders.

If we had an extra 3rd, I would not be so stressed about getting an edge in the first.  Get Warren, then pick up an edge, wr, and s in rounds 2-3.  Depth t, cb, dt, and lb in rounds 4-5 and we're ready to roll.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Christ dude you are losing it.  I was responding the the poster that said he wanted warren, I said we havent brought him in yet but have brought in other tight ends, therefor its highly unlikely we are drafting warren.  Thats pretty linear and not that hard to follow

I can't even begin to imagine what you have going on in your life that makes you such a miserable little prick on a daily basis. It most certainly isn't Panthers' football, but I hope it gets better for you.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Christ dude you are losing it.  I was responding the the poster that said he wanted warren, I said we havent brought him in yet but have brought in other tight ends, therefor its highly unlikely we are drafting warren.  Thats pretty linear and not that hard to follow

He wasn't arguing against your point. Simmer down.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Christ dude you are losing it.  I was responding the the poster that said he wanted warren, I said we havent brought him in yet but have brought in other tight ends, therefor its highly unlikely we are drafting warren.  Thats pretty linear and not that hard to follow

I lost it once a while back, but found it again about half an hour later.

As to Warren, don't know but I wouldn't rule anyone out based on visits. Plenty of teams (us included) draft players they might not have hosted.

Beyond that though, again it was just because you mentioned TEs. Wasn't making an argument on any particular point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, grimesgoat said:

That's a double win.  Picking up an extra 3rd and sticking them with Sanders.

If we had an extra 3rd, I would not be so stressed about getting an edge in the first.  Get Warren, then pick up an edge, wr, and s in rounds 2-3.  Depth t, cb, dt, and lb in rounds 4-5 and we're ready to roll.

and if I wanted Sanders (Saints) and "heard" that the Steelers and Panthers were chattering about a trade, I would consider trading up w/ Carolina.  It would be smart.  Carolina could be reluctant to trade back to 21 because Walker is on the board, for example, so Carolina would not lose out on their first-round target and add a third in a draft that has talent in the third (DT, for example).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...