Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Players to look out for


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I believe you Verge but it would be a HELL of a smokescreen if the Panthers had no interest in Walker 

I actually have that from both an internal and external source lol

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SOJA said:

also notably off your list is TMAC which I've read conflicting reports we are interested in or not 

2 days until I don't have to read "TMAC" in every thread. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Blackshear isn't an every-down back. The FO doesn't believe that he is either. He's here to return punts and kicks. And Jonathon Brooks likely ain't even playing in 2025. Who is the 5th guy...?

We have two legit guys right now to carry the load. Lord forbid that either gets hurt. This is a deep draft at RB. If they want to get a UDFA, OK...but this strategy hasn't really worked over the years from what I've been looking at. Day 3 is the answer.

He doesn't need to be.  How many bottom of the depth chart are every down backs?

Edited by csx
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Verge said:

I really haven't heard much one way or the other on TMAC

Not going to be a Panther triple stamp confirmed then.   Best of luck to whatever team picks up his 750/4 production. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, csx said:

He doesn't need to be.  How many bottom of the depth chart are every down backs?

Too lazy to name all of them, but I will say this: Eagles, Chiefs, Packers, Bills, Ravens, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

Pulling this from an old man memory but I think one of the three has a 1 year contract another has a bad knee. 

Yes you are correct.  Those 3 are locks for a roster spot this season. The 1 year rental gets them through this season to offset Brooks reinjury. Next season is when things get interesting in the RB room.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is a Grand Canyon-sized chasm between your opinion and the opinions of most former player hockey guys who do this for a living.
    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
×
×
  • Create New...