REPORT: per Albert Breer, Panthers have been most aggressive team in attempting to trade back

[TheSpecialJuan]

 

[flagfootballcoach28]

Just the thought of Dan Morgan trading back into the first round is not a move I am comfortable with. I honestly don’t trust him enough to get fair value. Dan Morgan is probably the GM other GM’s whisper/joke about and say “yeah just call Dan Morgan up, he’ll do anything” Hopefully he can prove me wrong. 

[jfra78]

1 minute ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Just the thought of Dan Morgan trading back into the first round is not a move I am comfortable with. I honestly don’t trust him enough to get fair value. Dan Morgan is probably the GM other GM’s whisper/joke about and say “yeah just call Dan Morgan up, he’ll do anything” Hopefully he can prove me wrong. 

When did he get fleeced again? All of his trades have been decent

[LinvilleGorge]

54 minutes ago, theinstrumental said:

That’s almost precisely equal on the more modern charts, btw. Like I said in the Steelers trade thread, I don’t think it’ll happen, but it wouldn’t be the end of the world.

Definitely not. Keep in mind, #10 got traded last year. They moved all the way down to #11 and picked up an extra 4th and 5th to move down that one spot. #17 got traded for #23 and a 5th plus 3rd and 4ths this year. #24 and a 7th got traded for #29 and #73. So a higher 3rd round pick last year meant moving up five spots in the late 1st. Moving up 12 spots into the top 10 needs to net a helluva lot more than a 3rd rounder. The draft pick value difference is worth roughly a late 1st rounder.

[CPF4LIFE]

Has to be atleast a 2nd rounder involved because I do want more picks in that round.

[jfra78]

2 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Has to be atleast a 2nd rounder involved because I do want more picks in that round.

What about a pick swap like Dallas 12 and 44 for 8 and 57?

[flagfootballcoach28]

19 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

When did he get fleeced again? All of his trades have been decent

Wasn’t a fan of any of his first three draft pick trades last year. You can make the argument that XL, Brooks, Wallace were all poor picks. All of whom he traded either up or down for. I’d rather have him stay put and pick from our scheduled #8 slot. He doesn’t seem to do well moving around and adjusting on the fly. Plus a lot of it is just a feeling. I still can’t get over how he was Fitterer’s right hand man along with his underwhelming draft last year. I don’t trust him yet. 

[jfra78]

Just now, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Wasn’t a fan of any of his first three draft pick trades last year. You can make the argument that XL, Brooks, Wallace were all poor picks. All of whom he traded either up or down for. I’d rather have him stay put and pick from our scheduled #8 slot. He doesn’t seem to do well moving around and adjusting on the fly. Plus a lot of it is just a feeling. I still can’t get over how he was Fitterer’s right hand man along with his underwhelming draft last year. I don’t trust him yet. 

The trades themselves were fine, you can even say we fleeced the Rams.  The picks have nothing to do with how other GM view us trading and think they can take advantage of Morgan

[Bear Hands]

1 minute ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Wasn’t a fan of any of his first three draft pick trades last year. You can make the argument that XL, Brooks, Wallace were all poor picks. All of whom he traded either up or down for. I’d rather have him stay put and pick from our scheduled #8 slot. He doesn’t seem to do well moving around and adjusting on the fly. Plus a lot of it is just a feeling. I still can’t get over how he was Fitterer’s right hand man along with his underwhelming draft last year. I don’t trust him yet. 

Felt like the Rams trade was good, but then we traded back up for the wrong guy when there were Frazier and Sainristil right there for us.  It seemed we got so set on XL & Brooks, it was "get those two and think about the rest after"  

[jfra78]

7 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Felt like the Rams trade was good, but then we traded back up for the wrong guy when there were Frazier and Sainristil right there for us.  It seemed we got so set on XL & Brooks, it was "get those two and think about the rest after"  

I get not liking the players but the trades were fine.  This idea that other GMs take advantage of Morgan is unwarranted 

[Jon Snow]

32 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

What about a pick swap like Dallas 12 and 44 for 8 and 57?

That's too much. They can give us their second and call it even.  I'm not giving them our second because they would win this trade by a lot. No they give is their second and we give them their 4th back and then we are even.

[csx]

48 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

When did he get fleeced again? All of his trades have been decent

Echo chamber 

[frankw]

18 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

The trades themselves were fine, you can even say we fleeced the Rams.  The picks have nothing to do with how other GM view us trading and think they can take advantage of Morgan

I mean it's strange to say the picks don't have to do with anything. We're heading into the 8th consecutive season of possibly yet another losing record. We're never going to alter trajectory if we can't start hitting on picks regardless of if we move around or how other teams perceive our GM.

[jfra78]

Just now, frankw said:

I mean it's strange to say the picks don't have to do with anything. We're heading into the 8th consecutive season of possibly yet another losing record. We're never going to alter trajectory if we can't start hitting on picks regardless of if we move around or how other teams perceive our GM.

They dont have anything to do with the trades and whether other teams are taking advantage of the Panthers