Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Shedur pranker has been identified. Son of Falcons coach copied the number


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm definitely not a fan of Deion's bullsh-t, and Shedeur acting like a dick in his interviews is his own fault.

All that said, this was not funny. Kicking somebody when they're down never is.

This dumbsh-t kid deserves whatever punishment he gets.

 

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was so weird and trashy to punch down on somebody that was already being actively punished for their actions.

Ulbrich's kid will likely be shown the grace they never considered giving Shedeur. 😕

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, joeyxfresco said:

If I’m the Falcons I’m concerned on how a staff members kid got confidential info like a prospects number. Makes you think what other dumb poo is being left out to expose if you can’t even keep a phone number in house

Eh, not so much, it's not like some random stranger on the street was able to get it from them, that would be concerning.

Do you lock your computer at home when you go to the kitchen to get a snack or go to the bathroom?

Of course not.

This is no different, unless this kid had done something in the past to make his dad think he'd do something like this, he'd have had no reason to think he needs to lock his computer/phone/etc in his own home if he was just in another room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's coming out that a whole bunch of players got pranked this draft, saw one player got a bunch of prank calls saying he was picked.

I wonder if the league did something different this year with how that all works or if these things have always happened and they were just kept under wraps in the past and the Sanders family putting this one out there publicly then made all the other players who got pranked come out and say something too.

But it does remind me of a great calling of a draft prospect prank a few years back.  A friend of the player, who was at the draft party, called him to mess with him, but since he saw on the ID who it was, he laughed it off right away as a "why would you call me right now" as opposed to trying to prank them as pretending to be a GM.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Eh, not so much, it's not like some random stranger on the street was able to get it from them, that would be concerning.

Do you lock your computer at home when you go to the kitchen to get a snack or go to the bathroom?

Of course not.

This is no different, unless this kid had done something in the past to make his dad think he'd do something like this, he'd have had no reason to think he needs to lock his computer/phone/etc in his own home if he was just in another room.

Mine is set to auto lock after a short time period. And if it has confidential data on it (as this one did), then it should be a short time period. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Davidson Deac II said:

Mine is set to auto lock after a short time period. And if it has confidential data on it (as this one did), then it should be a short time period. 

Again, yes and no.

Mine is also set to an auto lock of like 10 minutes, but that's still more than enough time for a stupid college kid to go do what he did while his dad went to grab a drink from the kitchen.

Coaches aren't out in public somewhere that having a quick lock is a necessity, they likely are only using their laptop/tablet in one of 2 places, at the team facility or in their own home, so fear of someone doing this in the 2 minutes they're away from their desk is basically 0% outside of something like this happening where it was his son.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Again, yes and no.

Mine is also set to an auto lock of like 10 minutes, but that's still more than enough time for a stupid college kid to go do what he did while his dad went to grab a drink from the kitchen.

Coaches aren't out in public somewhere that having a quick lock is a necessity, they likely are only using their laptop/tablet in one of 2 places, at the team facility or in their own home, so fear of someone doing this in the 2 minutes they're away from their desk is basically 0% outside of something like this happening where it was his son.

It is very, very easy for an org to set up an MDM that forces devices to lock after 5min of inactivity.

Bad opsec to not have that (nor an internal policy that requires devices be locked if not in use) especially given that there's likely access to other information like plays, limited medical info, etc

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tukafan21 said:

Again, yes and no.

Mine is also set to an auto lock of like 10 minutes, but that's still more than enough time for a stupid college kid to go do what he did while his dad went to grab a drink from the kitchen.

Coaches aren't out in public somewhere that having a quick lock is a necessity, they likely are only using their laptop/tablet in one of 2 places, at the team facility or in their own home, so fear of someone doing this in the 2 minutes they're away from their desk is basically 0% outside of something like this happening where it was his son.

I work in software and I can't imagine leaving my work laptop unlocked while unattended.  Home computer, sure.  Work machine?  I could lose my job.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...