Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ex-Panthers great Steve Smith sued under 'homewrecker law' for alleged affair.


Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

I may have missed something but did they actually prove that Smitty had an affair with her or not?

I mean, like him or not, that actually matters.

Just saying.

I don't think Smitty wants to get into the court proceedings of proving it. It would be well worth $100k to him simply to avoid that and getting an NDA out of this man and his thot of a wife.

The big bill he's facing is the one his likely soon to be ex-wife is gonna extract from him and honestly, good. They've been together since before his NFL days. She's been with him every step of the way as he's accumulated wealth. I don't know poo about divorce law but getting an NDA out of these folks before that all goes down couldn't hurt.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think Smitty wants to get into the court proceedings of proving it. It would be well worth $100k to him simply to avoid that and getting an NDA out of this man and his thot of a wife.

The big bill he's facing is the one his likely soon to be ex-wife is gonna extract from him and honestly, good. They've been together since before his NFL days. She's been with him every step of the way as he's accumulated wealth. I don't know poo about divorce law but getting an NDA out of these folks before that all goes down couldn't hurt.

Yea the guy would have to prove that his marriage was rock solid before the affair.  Steve could win if they take it to court, but he would be wise to just settle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Htarnation4.0 said:

Lawyers love these kinds of laws. All profit. 

Yeah, I get them getting involved. The husband not so much. Imagine airing ALL your dirty laundry for what will probably be a $20k payday after fees.

Maybe it's just me, but I ain't putting my personal life out there for used Hyundai money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Captroop said:

Yeah, I get them getting involved. The husband not so much. Imagine airing ALL your dirty laundry for what will probably be a $20k payday after fees.

Maybe it's just me, but I ain't putting my personal life out there for used Hyundai money.

That's the thing. The plan is to get the money before having to go through with all that. It's a bluffing game. Smitty is going to try to force the man to go through with it to avoid or reduce a payout and the man is going to try to convince Smitty he's willing to do it and he's definitely willing. Hell, he's already done it.

I cannot even imagine something more humiliating than sharing texts between your wife and another man with her praising him for knocking the bottom out of it and rearranging her IUD. I mean, oh my God... LOLOLOLOL

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, MHS831 said:

It is an antiquated law that basically treats the woman as the husband's property.  We will never hear about this again because Smitty will likely write the check--and the lawyers know it.

Max payout is $100K, which Smitty will never miss. I'd have already paid it to shut this guy up. Every time a news story comes out you know Mrs. Smitty gives him poo. If she leaves his ass it'll cost him a lot more than $100K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

Max payout is $100K, which Smitty will never miss. I'd have already paid it to shut this guy up. Every time a news story comes out you know Mrs. Smitty gives him poo. If she leaves his ass it'll cost him a lot more than $100K.

No “if” - you can all but guarantee she’s hitting the door and I don’t blame her. He ruined their family over some trash in Baltimore.

You can see her socials and his kids socials - the family is together, smiling - no Smitty or wedding ring in sight.

Ice Up Son.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think Smitty wants to get into the court proceedings of proving it. It would be well worth $100k to him simply to avoid that and getting an NDA out of this man and his thot of a wife.

The big bill he's facing is the one his likely soon to be ex-wife is gonna extract from him and honestly, good. They've been together since before his NFL days. She's been with him every step of the way as he's accumulated wealth. I don't know poo about divorce law but getting an NDA out of these folks before that all goes down couldn't hurt.

And still, is there any proof that he even had the affair?

There's money, but there's also the damage to a multiple decades marriage with kids that could be caused simply because someone lied to their spouse that they'd had an affair with a celebrity. 

I mean, we seem very, very ready to convict him of doing it on no actual proof. And that ain't right, for him or for anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

And still, is there any proof that he even had the affair?

There's money, but there's also the damage to a multiple decades marriage with kids that could be caused simply because someone lied to their spouse that they'd had an affair with a celebrity. 

I mean, we seem very, very ready to convict him of doing it on no actual proof. And that ain't right, for him or for anyone.

Did you see the texts? Did you listen to the recording of the call? I mean... 

If you want to just delusionally support your hero, cool. But the writing has been on the wall about who Smitty is off the field for a long time. Loved watching the guy play ball but he's a guy I have zero desire to meet and I'm done defending him.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smitty is a legendary footballer player but this has really damaged his reputation as a person. You don’t cheat on a woman who has been with you through everything and gave you children and especially not with another man’s wife. He doesn’t even have any remorse about it, acting like nothing happened.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

I mean the thinking would be that a married women has just as much to lose as you so the married women most likely doesn’t want to get caught either versus the single women who dgaf and might get you caught

Think About It GIF by Identity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...