Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An honest look at Bryce Young


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Icege said:

Jalen Hurts went 14 of 21 for 108yds in that same game too...

🤔

If we're gonna cherry-pick stats, of course. 😛

Good teams play down to there competition...it happens. I don't know why yall think this doesn't apply here as well. The jalen hurts in the playoffs blows this team out, same for mahomes and KC. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/4/2025 at 12:17 PM, AggieLean said:

Im still hesitant on Bryce. 
 

Needs to get us out of drafting in the top 10. If we are, I go QB. 

Exactly this.   He controls his own future and it's basically decided this coming season.  As the #1 overall pick in his third season at qb, if we are picking in the top 5 or 6 next draft in a very qb heavy draft,  he made his own bed.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Navy_football said:

So can we all at least agree that he's physically able to play the position at a high level? There were a lot of weird takes on here before like:

1. he's too short to see the field. all of his passes will be batted down. he'll have to do that hop pass just to get the ball over defenders. he just won't ever be effective passing in the middle of the field. and will never be able to take snaps from under center.

2. he's too small; he'll get injured the first time he's hit; he'll go down whenever he's touched by a defender

3. he's too slow to outrun defensive linemen. he just won't be able to escape the rush or make defenders miss. 

4. his arm is just too weak to throw the deep out in tight coverage. or to complete a deep pass

Did I miss anything? And he showed he was able to do all of those things his rookie season. Just not consistently. Obviously the problem was always  mental. Confidence and trust in his team mates. 

I think both things can be true.  I think he is capable of playing at a high level, I also think without any elite physical traits,  and his height, he has a much smaller margin of error.  Both things can be true.  All physical traits and his brain are all tools.  The more tools you have in your bag the more chances you have to get the job done, but that doesn't mean you cant with minimal tools.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Navy_football said:

So can we all at least agree that he's physically able to play the position at a high level? There were a lot of weird takes on here before like:

1. he's too short to see the field. all of his passes will be batted down. he'll have to do that hop pass just to get the ball over defenders. he just won't ever be effective passing in the middle of the field. and will never be able to take snaps from under center.

2. he's too small; he'll get injured the first time he's hit; he'll go down whenever he's touched by a defender

3. he's too slow to outrun defensive linemen. he just won't be able to escape the rush or make defenders miss. 

4. his arm is just too weak to throw the deep out in tight coverage. or to complete a deep pass

Did I miss anything? And he showed he was able to do all of those things his rookie season. Just not consistently. Obviously the problem was always  mental. Confidence and trust in his team mates. 

When we’re able to run a QB sneak, then those fears will ease from me.

  • Pie 3
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AggieLean said:

When we’re able to run a QB sneak, then those fears will ease from me.

For better or worse I don't think that's ever going to be on the table. What game was it last year where we got ourselves into multiple 4th and 1 situations on the opponents side of the field and every single time Dave Canales opted to bring out Eddie Pinero who proceeded to miss wide? It's definitely something they are going to have to figure out.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AggieLean said:

When we’re able to run a QB sneak, then those fears will ease from me.

I could give AF about a QB sneak.  Plenty of QBs also couldn't scramble the way that Bryce can, you work with what you have.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NAS said:

I could give AF about a QB sneak.  Plenty of QBs also couldn't scramble the way that Bryce can, you work with what you have.  

Why? Look how tough sometimes short yardage situations can be for teams to get in the NFL.

The Eagles or other large body QBs have no problem picking it up. Not being able to QB sneak can completely change game plans, making it much harder to be unpredictable as an offense. 

Go ask Eagle fans if they care about having a QB n oline that can almost guarantee a 3rd or 4th and 1 AUTOMATIC

Game changer type ish

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I guess you hated the cam era

No I loved Cam but he had his own weaknesses, over reliance on arm strength and not throwing with anticipation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

I think both things can be true.  I think he is capable of playing at a high level, I also think without any elite physical traits,  and his height, he has a much smaller margin of error.  Both things can be true.  All physical traits and his brain are all tools.  The more tools you have in your bag the more chances you have to get the job done, but that doesn't mean you cant with minimal tools.

I was ready to let this go but I think you're all missing the point I was making. 

A lot of guys were making definitive statements like Bryce can't do something because "insert physical limitation". My point is that he can. And he can consistently do it. No, he doesn't do it like Mahomes or Josh Allen. He does it like Bryce Young. And he's able to do it consistently. 

Now QB sneak is probably legit. That's probably not in his bag. But honestly, it's probably better to have another guy to take those hits for your QB. If you have a freak like Cam, Allen or Hurts, sure go ahead. They feed off of those plays too. Most other QBs wouldn't have a problem bringing in a RB/TE type for short yardage runs up the gut. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Why can't they just bring in someone like Tremble to run a tush push like play on "and 1" situations?

That used to be a fullback play in my day. 100% could be that today as well. Snap the ball to a guy that's used to moving guys when he has the ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...