Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some...concerning UNC / Belichick news

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Huddle Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Greatman77 said:

I never try to judge another person's relationship, but let's be honest - No good-looking 24 year old woman is dating a 73 year old man for love, especially if he is wealthy/famous.

And no 73 year old rich dude is dating a 24 year old good looking woman for her great conversation. LOL!

They're both getting what they want out of this "arrangement", old Bill just needs to wake up and realize that he can get what he wants with a lot less baggage.

  • Pie 4
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Greatman77 said:

I never try to judge another person's relationship, but let's be honest - No good-looking 24 year old woman is dating a 73 year old man for love, especially if he is wealthy/famous.

Same and true.  But after wheat I’ve experienced in life, give me an Anna Nicole Smith when I’m about to kick the bucket.  Idgaf if it isn’t love.🤣

  • Pie 1
  • The D 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

And no 73 year old rich dude is dating a 24 year old good looking woman for her great conversation. LOL!

They're both getting what they want out of this "arrangement", old Bill just needs to wake up and realize that he can get what he wants with a lot less baggage.

It's called the "girlfriend" experience fantasy 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WUnderhill Grand Master

WUnderhill

Posted
Posted

image.gif.2c96a3871eca179743fad8008b82f594.gif

The school has already said this isn’t true. Just part of SECSPN’s continuing smear campaign against Belichik for dating a 24 year old. Not that I approve, and sure they are probably both using each other, but they’re both adults so whatever. Media hack Pablo Torre is defending his rumor spreading by crying that the school did not grace his information requests with a response in a manner timely enough for the ego of an SECSPN reporter, therefore it is ok in his opinion to spread rumor as fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted

I think the whole escort thing is a bit out of hand, seems kinda clear to me that it was one of those sugar daddy type of deals that likely just went on for too long and they developed "feelings" for each other and turned it into a weird relationship.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stumpy Grand Master

Stumpy

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, NAS said:

Tarheels 

She's not an escort, she was dating another CEO prior to this who is also 64 years old.  She clearly is a gold digger and looking to capitalize off Belichick's brand and recognition.  She already amassed an $8MM real estate portfolio since theys started dating.  She's overplayed her hand though with the most recent activities.  

UNC ban will either cause Bill and her to break up or Bill may likely break up with UNC. 

Wasn't she 19 when Bill "helped her with her psychology homework?" What 64yo CEO was dating a highschooler?

Everybody involved in this looks fuging disgusting!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...