Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

something to feel good about in the offseason..."could be something special brewing in Carolina"


Recommended Posts

On 5/20/2025 at 4:05 PM, PNW_PantherMan said:

I used to feel the same way, but losers lose and winners win.  There's not a real world example of tanking working in the NFL.  

You don't tank week 1-10, only when the maths states you are out. At that point you have a losing season. In order to ensure that never happens again, you want the best value/odds to achieve the goal. That can come in trade value package or elite players via the 1st pick in each round. 

The worst thing that can happen is drafting 16-19th due to wins that you, I, and fans will never recall in future years....But I bet you remember those old playoff runs, right brother!!!!

Keep Pounding!

Keep Smart!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Basbear said:

You don't tank week 1-10, only when the maths states you are out. At that point you have a losing season. In order to ensure that never happens again, you want the best value/odds to achieve the goal. That can come in trade value package or elite players via the 1st pick in each round. 

The worst thing that can happen is drafting 16-19th due to wins that you, I, and fans will never recall in future years....But I bet you remember those old playoff runs, right brother!!!!

Keep Pounding!

Keep Smart!!

I can only assume you never played sports at any high level or you would know the tiny bump you get moving up the draft is far outweighed by the damage you do to coaches and players whose future relies on sticking in the league and performing. Players see you don't care about them or the team success and will help you tank by giving up. Once that happens your franchise will suffer for years and develop a loser mentality like we have. 

No that would be crappy advice and saying it repeatedly doesn't make it better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

I can only assume you never played sports at any high level or you would know the tiny bump you get moving up the draft is far outweighed by the damage you do to coaches and players whose future relies on sticking in the league and performing. Players see you don't care about them or the team success and will help you tank by giving up. Once that happens your franchise will suffer for years and develop a loser mentality like we have. 

No that would be crappy advice and saying it repeatedly doesn't make it better.

Not college, but I got plenty of trophies. I worked after school and during college. I stayed in gyms and living conditions with athletes and been in small areas with some of the strongest humans alive. In two over-sea tours working as a contractor, I worked in three man teams and most times by myself during the job. Won go-cart championships with only one other as well. I guess that's me to a T, Im either solo or in a 2-3 man unit. You need to look at this from a different angle than players. Owner, GM, coaches would GREATLY benefit, that statement of yours is 100% false. Plenty of drafts show the difference in value between 1st overall and 9th or recently 2nd and 5th or 3rd and 12th. You can research it and see, but I think you know. 

You are a loser at 2-13, 3-13, and 4-13... No fake fluff late season wins change that. Those "vets" by seasons end are banged and bruised and sprained up, besides they have already lost. Start the next year team plan now, try new plays or calls. Or keep playing those "vets" who lead the 1 win by week 15, makes no difference. The goal is never be in that position, you use your brain and look at the big picture and not feelings, do the smartest and correct plan to your future path. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Basbear said:

Not college, but I got plenty of trophies. I worked after school and during college. I stayed in gyms and living conditions with athletes and been in small areas with some of the strongest humans alive. In two over-sea tours working as a contractor, I worked in three man teams and most times by myself during the job. Won go-cart championships with only one other as well. I guess that's me to a T, Im either solo or in a 2-3 man unit. You need to look at this from a different angle than players. Owner, GM, coaches would GREATLY benefit, that statement of yours is 100% false. Plenty of drafts show the difference in value between 1st overall and 9th or recently 2nd and 5th or 3rd and 12th. You can research it and see, but I think you know. 

You are a loser at 2-13, 3-13, and 4-13... No fake fluff late season wins change that. Those "vets" by seasons end are banged and bruised and sprained up, besides they have already lost. Start the next year team plan now, try new plays or calls. Or keep playing those "vets" who lead the 1 win by week 15, makes no difference. The goal is never be in that position, you use your brain and look at the big picture and not feelings, do the smartest and correct plan to your future path. 

Apparently you must have been on losing teams and it stained you.  There is no justification for purposely losing and a wall of justifications or rationalizations don't change the reality. Any GM or coach that would do as you suggest wouldn't have made it to this level if he wasn't all in on winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

Apparently you must have been on losing teams and it stained you.  There is no justification for purposely losing and a wall of justifications or rationalizations don't change the reality. Any GM or coach that would do as you suggest wouldn't have made it to this level if he wasn't all in on winning.

If tanking is such a smart strategy then how many times has it been done in the last 10 years in the NFL and substantially improved the team moving forward? Since this is a copycat league there must be numerous examples with the trend growing each year. Or it is simply a fan concept that the same 4 or 5 huddlers keep bringing up as smart strategies that teams don't employ or consider. I wonder why??

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, panthers55 said:

If tanking is such a smart strategy then how many times has it been done in the last 10 years in the NFL and substantially improved the team moving forward? Since this is a copycat league there must be numerous examples with the trend growing each year. Or it is simply a fan concept that the same 4 or 5 huddlers keep bringing up as smart strategies that teams don't employ or consider. I wonder why??

I'd say there are a fair amount of examples of tank attempts by NFL front offices over the years.   It definitely is a thing.   But it's stupid. 

and you can look at  our last tank attempt as why it is stupid.  Tanking is a front office strategy.  One that coaches and players aren't working in agreement with.  So what can happen? Well, you can enter tank mindset as a front office.....and then a Steve Wilks will do what he did to make the CMC trade/tank pointless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

I'd say there are a fair amount of examples of tank attempts by NFL front offices over the years.   It definitely is a thing.   But it's stupid. 

and you can look at your last tank attempt as why it is stupid.  Tanking is a front office strategy.  One that coaches and players aren't working in agreement with.  So what can happen? Well, you can enter tank mindset as a front office.....and then a Steve Wilks will do what he did to make the CMC trade/tank pointless. 

I think people like 55 are confusing tanking with rebuilding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, CRA said:

I'd say there are a fair amount of examples of tank attempts by NFL front offices over the years.   It definitely is a thing.   But it's stupid. 

and you can look at  our last tank attempt as why it is stupid.  Tanking is a front office strategy.  One that coaches and players aren't working in agreement with.  So what can happen? Well, you can enter tank mindset as a front office.....and then a Steve Wilks will do what he did to make the CMC trade/tank pointless. 

Like you said, teams have been accused of tanking for a specific player but why would players or coaches go along when they know every game is a resume that goes with them. Sure like in our case the tanking was getting rid of quality players for peanuts and teams can trade their assets. But players are going to play hard for many reasons. And get out of dodge as soon as they possibly can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/22/2025 at 7:56 AM, CRA said:

I'd say there are a fair amount of examples of tank attempts by NFL front offices over the years.   It definitely is a thing.   But it's stupid. 

and you can look at  our last tank attempt as why it is stupid.  

I don't think we have ever tanked.  Dumping big contracts when you think the season is pretty much over, in order to reset, is different from tanking.     

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I don't think we have ever tanked.  Dumping big contracts when you think the season is pretty much over, in order to reset, is different from tanking.     

Agreed. I don't think most teams tank. The one team that I think DEFINITELY tanked was the Colts on their "suck for Luck" campaign. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I don't think we have ever tanked.  Dumping big contracts when you think the season is pretty much over, in order to reset, is different from tanking.     

I don't know,  John Fox's lame duck season was pretty much a tank set up by the owner and front office

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I don't think we have ever tanked.  Dumping big contracts when you think the season is pretty much over, in order to reset, is different from tanking.     

I’d say firing Rhule in season with the #1 overall in clear sight…..and then dumping CMC for peanuts was an in season tank move by the FO to secure the #1 overall pick…..and it failed (because the HC and players aren’t involved in that mindset) 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/18/2025 at 3:40 AM, tukafan21 said:

 

It's not only about the draft spots, the scheduling is a huge factor.

We already have a tough 2026 schedule by playing the North divisions, that's possibly 7 playoff contenders there and a few true SB contenders between the Lions, Packers, Vikings, Bears, Ravens, Bengals, and Steelers (Browns will still suck lol), while also pulling the AFC West for the 17th game.

 

And our division Foes have the same basic schedule.  Win the division.  Get into the playoffs and go for it all. 

If we lose in the playoffs we at least have experience in the playoffs.  I'll take the playoff experience over a couple of draft spots.  We just have to hope DM and DC can continue to pick studs in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/19/2025 at 2:54 PM, CRA said:

and we are still way too dependent on what will be a 12th year AT (who debated retirement) and didn't stay healthy last year. 

AT should be a teams #4.  He remains our actual #1 target. 

I may be in the minority with this, but I don’t think we know who our #1 receiver will be at this point. The development of our young receivers will be the key. It could be AT, or Renfro could be more of a factor than we think. If the injury bug stays away it will be interesting for sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, we built on that momentum alright. LOL Trying to prop up a QB with a game plan instead of trying to do your best to win a game with the tools you have at your disposal is what you do with a rookie early on in his career on a bad team. It's not what you do with a 3rd year #1 overall pick when you're shockingly sitting at 6-5 and playing for the division lead.
    • Canales outsmarts himself on a very consisent basis. In some ways, he is one of the most ill suited to be head coach of the Tepper tenure.
    • i find this to be alarming on so many levels  im going to change the order of the portions i copied from Joe’s article i  really have serious doubts   about Canales’ common sense  1. A running team forgetting to run  2. Making this game plan about Young’s passing game momentum .  Total idiot.  It is about winning games not about young’s momentum. That is what practice is for , not live games  god help us all.    Article below  Confused by the Panthers’ pass-heavy play calls vs. 49ers? Rico Dowdle probably was, too   CHARLOTTE, N.C. — In two seasons here, Canales has juggled offensive play calling with his head coach responsibilities. Sometimes the balls end up on the floor. In two critical moments Monday night, Canales chose to go with a pass in situations where a handoff would have been the more direct approach. The first was the disastrous, first-and-goal play from the 1 where Bryce Young opted against running in for the score and instead lobbed the ball toward rookie Mitchell Evans, only to see safety Ji’Ayir Brown come down with it. The second one was just as perplexing. When the 49ers were whistled for roughing long snapper J.J. Jansen on Ryan Fitzgerald’s successful PAT pulled the Panthers to 17-10, Canales took the point off the board and went for a 2-pointer from the 1. But Canales ran a play that didn’t take advantage of the spot, with Young missing Jalen Coker in the back of the end zone. (Rookie wideout Jimmy Horn Jr. appeared to be the first read in the flat.) Canales said after the game he wanted to build on Young’s record-breaking passing performance in Atlanta, and thought the line was protecting well. But that lack of rhythm Canales mentioned was the result of never giving Dowdle the opportunity to get into it. When Dowdle ripped off a 17-yard gain on the first offensive play of the second half, Canales came back to him two plays later. It was his final carry.   After an overnight, cross-country flight, Rico Dowdle began his Tuesday — at least on social media — with an emoji. Dowdle’s post on Xcontained no words accompanying the face with spiral eyes emoji, which EmojiTerra tells us symbolizes “confusion, dizziness, overwhelm or being utterly shocked.” Per the website, it’s often used to convey “feeling dazed, hypnotized, or caught off-guard in troubling or surprising situations.” It’s not hard to figure out why the Carolina Panthers running back would be feeling some or all of those emotions. Dowdle has been one of the Panthers’ fun, feel-good stories this season, an Asheville native who signed a prove-it deal with his home-state team and then got right to the business of proving it. Before the Panthers hosted the Dallas Cowboys in Week 6, Dowdle warned his former team to “buckle up,” then backed up his words by running for 183 yards and racking up 239 yards from scrimmage. But in a 20-9 loss to the San Francisco 49ers on Monday night, it was Dowdle who was buckled up. And the guy who strapped Dowdle into a safety harness and threw on the child-safety locks was none other than Panthers coach Dave Canales. Dowdle led all backs Monday — including Christian McCaffrey — by averaging 6.3 yards per carry. But while 49ers coach Kyle Shanahan was feeding McCaffrey a cornucopia of 24 carries and 31 touches, Dowdle finished with a meager six rushing attempts. That matched his season low from a loss at Arizona in Week 2, when Chuba Hubbard was still RB1 and the Panthers were throwing nearly every down in the second half trying to catch up. Dowdle wasn’t the only back Canales dissed. Hubbard had just three carries and the Panthers finished with 13 as a team, tied for the fifth fewest in franchise history. Some of it was about opportunity, or lack of it. With the 49ers’ two touchdown drives consuming more than 16 minutes, the Panthers ran just 43 offensive plays, which matched their low under Canales and tied for the second fewest in team history. But Canales, who arrived in Charlotte last year preaching the balanced offense gospel, conceded Tuesday that he didn’t emphasize the running plays on his call sheet nearly enough. “Offensively, just could not get our rhythm going. And really it just started off with the run game. I have to make sure that that comes alive,” he said during an opening statement to reporters. “That’s a part of who we are. It’s a part of what we believe in. We have two great backs that contribute to this team. The offensive line was blocking well and that was a missed opportunity by me. And I’ll do better in that regard.”        
×
×
  • Create New...