Teams with the most cap dedicated to the OL

[PadresPanthersFan]

12 hours ago, ECHornet said:

Rice, Worthy, Royals is a good young core. 

T Mac, x, Coker and horn might be better

[L-TownCat]

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty sure nobody's expecting to hear me complain about prioritizing large men who are also ugly...

...nor should they be.

I’m positive you have no problems with it.  My post was about my own view of the situation.

[ECHornet]

2 hours ago, PadresPanthersFan said:

T Mac, x, Coker and horn might be better

Maybe so. I don’t think I’d trade our WR room for theirs, but there’s so much unknown with our group. 

Edited Monday at 07:00 PM by ECHornet

[DeAngelo Beason]

I can think of no better place to spend the money.  

[Icege]

It's beautiful.

Hoping that whoever the team ends up starting at RT + C in the 2026 season are monsters on rookie deals.

[Htarnation4.0]

19 hours ago, ECHornet said:

We’re paying the price for restructuring Moton this year. It would be extremely timely if we hit on a young tackle next offseason. 

I think that's what we do in the 1st round next year. 

[PanthersATL]

21 hours ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Zero problem with paying big money to the OL. Other than QB, there isn't a more important position group on the field.

Tee Dog would disagree

[Waldo]

7 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I think the rub is being a dumpster fire team. Same issue the NYG have being on that list.

 

Without the wins it's just spent cap. Nothing to celebrate yet for either of those teams. 

[onmyown]

Works for me. Better than spending all the cap on LBs, TEs and RBs.

[Basbear]

23 hours ago, shaq said:

I will never be against spending on the offensive or defensive line, that is where the game is won.

 

This is me as well. Pour resources into the lines, draft, cash, and staff. I would also say it makes it easier to win, but great coaching can scheme up lesser lines. 

[poorboysrev]

8 hours ago, Navy_football said:

Wasn't that Brady's kryptonite too? Middle pressure doesn't allow any QB to step up to avoid speed rushers, or allow them to step into their throws. Not just a small QB issue.

Yeah people are crazy that’s an all QB issue. You can scheme away( IF the coaches adjust) certain things but also teams are searching for a weakness. Best move right now is to give Bryce a chance to be the guy. If he’s not the answer the next QB walks into a much better situation

[Basbear]

1 hour ago, onmyown said:

Works for me. Better than spending all the cap on LBs, TEs and RBs.

 

If I ran the teams unless I had elite HOFer type players- Im not paying safety, LBs, or RBs.

I would pour resources into TE and somehow land 2 top 10 guys and pay them the current market/happy money. This is something I believe the NFL is totally wrong on and has been for some time. 

Basically whatever allows me to control the middle of the field, Im spending all the juice there until I reach the level needed. 

[kungfoodude]

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

 

If I ran the teams unless I had elite HOFer type players- Im not paying safety, LBs, or RBs.

I would pour resources into TE and somehow land 2 top 10 guys and pay them the current market/happy money. This is something I believe the NFL is totally wrong on and has been for some time. 

Basically whatever allows me to control the middle of the field, Im spending all the juice there until I reach the level needed. 

Oh boy....this is a borderline post. What was the TE nut that posted here for years until he was banned?

[poorboysrev]

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Oh boy....this is a borderline post. What was the TE nut that posted here for years until he was banned?

Sanjay I do believe….every time I hear the talking heads predict  a top ten TE to us I pray that we’re not the team dumb enough to do it. Because it has never paid off ha