Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Little 70 yard FG


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

 

Yes and no

End of half situations, sure, but in reality, even if he has the leg for that long of a kick, 98 times out of 100 they aren't going to even consider it because missing it gives the other team crazy good field position.

This 100%. If you miss your opponent gets the ball on their side of the field.

Massive risk except for the scenarios you listed above.

70 yards is crazy as hell though.

Hope he doesn't hit one like that against us in Week 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Seltzer said:

This 100%. If you miss your opponent gets the ball on their side of the field.

Massive risk except for the scenarios you listed above.

70 yards is crazy as hell though.

Hope he doesn't hit one like that against us in Week 1

70 yards is not the concern though.  If he can make it consistently from 65 yards, that means that anytime they get two yards beyond the 50, they are going to kick.  

Of course, the key word is consistently.  Just because he made this one, doesn't mean he makes the next two or three.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

70 yards is not the concern though.  If he can make it consistently from 65 yards, that means that anytime they get two yards beyond the 50, they are going to kick.  

Of course, the key word is consistently.  Just because he made this one, doesn't mean he makes the next two or three.  

Nobody is consistent from 65 yards.

Justin Tucker is the best long distance kicker in league history and even he's only 64/96 from 50+ in his career.

So again, they'll try those super long ones in end of half situations or in the 2nd half of games to where a made FG will tie or take the lead.  But in the first half or when they have a lead (or down more than 3 points), they aren't going to be trying many 65+ yard FGs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Yet

Twenty years ago, 55 or more was a significant risk.  Now its somewhat common.  

Sure, but correct me if I'm wrong, they also changed the missed FG rules a little while back (maybe 5ish years ago I think?).

Maybe I'm remembering it wrong, but years ago, if you missed a FG, the other team got the ball from the LOS, but now they get the ball where it was kicked from, right?

If I'm remembering it right, that meant missing a 55 yard FG with the old rules would give the ball to the other team at their own 38 yard line, where as a miss from 65 yards now gives them the ball at your own 45 yard line.

10 yard difference in the FG length, but 17 yards difference in field position for the other team.  When you combine that with how much stronger kicker's legs are today, the risk level for a 55 yarder back then is nowhere near comparable to a 65 yarder now.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

70 yards is not the concern though.  If he can make it consistently from 65 yards, that means that anytime they get two yards beyond the 50, they are going to kick.  

Of course, the key word is consistently.  Just because he made this one, doesn't mean he makes the next two or three.  

It is a concern in a potential late game situation that comes down to last possession. Separately if he kicks consistently between 50 and 60 it also results in more points per possession during the course of the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I fully expect them to pick up his 5th year , and they're waiting for him to put a full excellent consistent season of QB play in year 4 or 5. If that don't happen,  they'll eventually cut ties.  Here's to hoping he just goes on a team in 2026. The worst thing he could do is continue to see-saw us to around .500 records because it might be impossible to replace him at that point unless youre willing to do the veteran qb carousel poo we did from 2019 to 2023.   
    • What do you think of Bryce Youngs career thus far? Are you excited about his progress or is it not enough for you? I included a poll of ranking his performance through 3 years thus far.  I personally think he's made some decent progress. Has had some high moments (last half of 2024, Rams game, ATL game in 2025)  but in my mind, those are still outweighed by the many more lowlights thus far (ex turnovers, missed throws, poor decisions)  It's a very mixed bag for me. He's done enough to get a 5th year option but by no means should we lock him in with a 50+ mil a year multi year deal. I want to see him play consistently well for a full year before that happens (yes, I'm still saying that going into year 4. That might be telling).  Just sucks when you see CJ Stroud, Jayden Daniel's, Caleb Williams almost immediately lighting poo up with their arm talent. Maybe Bryce is just an ultra slow burn. I don't know what to think anymore. Guess we're gonna be stuck with him for a whilr unless we end up being bad enough to earn a high pick next year. I doubted it lol. Overall Stats for his career:       ● 14 W - 30L (regular season)       ● 0-1 playoffs record        ● 61.4% completion, 8291 passing yards, 49 TDs, 30 INTs  Year 1:       ● 2 wins, 14 losses      ● 60% completion rate, 2877 passing yards, 11 TD to 10 INTs, 5.5 yards per attempted pass Year 2:        ● 4 wins , 8 losses        ● 60.9% completion rate,  2403 passing yards, 15 TD, 9 INTs,  6.3 yards per attempted pass  Year 3:        ● 8 Wins, 8 Losses         ● 63.6% competition rate, 3011 passing yards, 23 TDs to 11 INTs  Playoffs         ● 1 game in year 3 ( 0 - 1 in playoffs)         ● 21/40 (52.5% completion rate), 264 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT. 
    • Raiders receive: 19th overall Xavier Legette Panthers receive: Maxx Crosby 3rd rounder
×
×
  • Create New...