Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKiNG NEWS: Panthers interested in trading for Trey Hendrickson

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

It’s going to cost draft capital and a massive contract.  Dude will be 31 this year.  fug THAT

Yeah gotta think a 2nd or 3rd and then 30+ mill for 3 years 

We aren’t winning the SB this year. So now you’re banking on everything we saw to be true back off of last year. That we continue on upward trajectory and that Henderson is still going to be an elite edge guy at 32 and 33.

Idk… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthercougar68 Grand Master

Panthercougar68

Posted
Posted
Just now, The Lobo said:

Thank you

 

IMO, if they are paying big money and giving up a lot of assets, it should be for Parsons 

Slick Rick put out that Green Bay has a massive offer for Parsons on the the table but the fact Dallas isn’t budging shows that whole thing is Jerry being Jerry ie the spot light.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlazeCarolina Experienced

BlazeCarolina

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

A simple phone call to see what’s wanted counts as “interested” in today’s Twitter sphere.

But from a number of Bengals people online the Trey/Cincy relationship is pretty bad and worst than what the media portrays the Parsons/Dallas one to be.

I mean...we wouldn't call if we had no interest.  Their job is to generate clicks.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Seltzer Veteran

Seltzer

Posted
Posted

We absolutely should try to trade for Hendrickson.

We have plenty of cap, and I can't imagine the deal will be longer than 3 years.

We're saving a ton on QB and most of the skill positions.

Invest in the lines. Pass rush is definitely the biggest concern on this defense right now.

The normal goofs who secretly root for this team to be bad are against it, but anybody who actually supports this team and wants to win knows this would be a great move.

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tr3ach Grand Master

Tr3ach

Posted
Posted

He doesnt fit in our scheme at all, trading assets, his age, and the huge contract.   It makes absolutely no sense and im hoping its all just people guessing based on our previous need for pass rush.   He is a 43 end, I wouldn't want him at edge.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PantherChris
      NHL Olympics Thread (Or just Olympics in general)

      By PantherChris · Posted

      They also didn't mind it last year during four nations, or when they beat the fins lol. Sour grapes, they had 3 pf the top four players in the world on the ice when we beat them.
    • rebelrouser
      Mike Kaye: LB Devin Lloyd could be a realistic possibility

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      The tag for '26 is 28M. No way they tag him.  He is projected to be worth around 60M for 3 years so they could still try to sign him on an extension for about that amount: JagsWire   As someone else mentioned, the tag average factors in outside linebackers, aka, edge rushers, in the line backer formula.  If they would distinguish between olb and ilb, the ilb would get a lot less. 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Should Dave Canalas be on the HOT seat??

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      He didn't actually make the playoffs. We had several opportunities to clinch on our own and crapped the bed. We had to wait for Atlanta to win to get us in. We had the tie breaker in a poo division that had 3 teams finish 8-9.  If you go back and look at the games we played, we weren't a dominant offensive team under him as an OC. We beat the Jets 13-7 and barely beat the packers after they failed to convert multiple red zone trips. We relied heavily on converting 4th downs. DC was also extremely slow at recognizing trends in game and was really lacking with clock management.  Was there progress this year? Yes. But most of it was on the defensive side of the ball. Our offense was stagnant with a couple of exceptions. Any improvement from Bryce was minimal and he kept insisting on XL over Coker, and even RB distribution instead of going with the hot hand.  He may be building something, but I don't think we've seen enough to know what that is. It could go either direction. If he insists on being OC, then without a noticeable improvement, yes he needs to be on the hot seat like any OC would. The more jobs you take on the more you have to be judged on. I think he would have a longer leash if he hired a true OC and just focused in being HC.   
×
×
  • Create New...