Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKiNG NEWS: Panthers interested in trading for Trey Hendrickson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

It’s going to cost draft capital and a massive contract.  Dude will be 31 this year.  fug THAT

Yeah gotta think a 2nd or 3rd and then 30+ mill for 3 years 

We aren’t winning the SB this year. So now you’re banking on everything we saw to be true back off of last year. That we continue on upward trajectory and that Henderson is still going to be an elite edge guy at 32 and 33.

Idk… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Lobo said:

Thank you

 

IMO, if they are paying big money and giving up a lot of assets, it should be for Parsons 

Slick Rick put out that Green Bay has a massive offer for Parsons on the the table but the fact Dallas isn’t budging shows that whole thing is Jerry being Jerry ie the spot light.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

A simple phone call to see what’s wanted counts as “interested” in today’s Twitter sphere.

But from a number of Bengals people online the Trey/Cincy relationship is pretty bad and worst than what the media portrays the Parsons/Dallas one to be.

I mean...we wouldn't call if we had no interest.  Their job is to generate clicks.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We absolutely should try to trade for Hendrickson.

We have plenty of cap, and I can't imagine the deal will be longer than 3 years.

We're saving a ton on QB and most of the skill positions.

Invest in the lines. Pass rush is definitely the biggest concern on this defense right now.

The normal goofs who secretly root for this team to be bad are against it, but anybody who actually supports this team and wants to win knows this would be a great move.

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He doesnt fit in our scheme at all, trading assets, his age, and the huge contract.   It makes absolutely no sense and im hoping its all just people guessing based on our previous need for pass rush.   He is a 43 end, I wouldn't want him at edge.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...