Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers have an effort problem


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Dabo is a consummate college coach. He's a recruiter and motivator. The NFL is a lot more about Xs and Os. Great college coach but I don't think he'd translate well at all to the NFL level.

Yeah it's one thing to put the fear of God into a bunch of wide eyed 18 and 19 year olds who are living away from their parents and family for the first time in their lives.  It's easy to get them to do what you want, and if they aren't getting it, Dabo runs a blue chip program with access to the best recruits in the country.  So see ya, enjoy the bench.  That setup would be like an NFL team having five first round picks in the draft every year.

Harbaugh and Carroll have managed to make the transition successfully but there are many more who haven't, one of whom we're familiar with.

Edited by The NFL Shield At Midfield
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

That was an entire culture created.

Luke, Cam, TD, Kalil, Greg, Stew, Star, Tolbert, KK, Norman, the team just came together and those guys really had a cohesive well-defined locker room.  Heck, we had guys feeding off it like Bene, Fozzy, and Addison as part of the culture-definition.  

I will welcome whoever can step up and start bringing that type of energy to this team. 

Right now- If I'm looking personalities:

Hunt, Moehrig, McMillan, Princely, Wallace seem to fit the potential on energy side of things.  Those are who I'd identify that could grow into those type of players.  Would love to see it.  

I also feel stoic Ron.....was a lot tougher than credited for.   He didn't do the sideline theatrics.  But every once in awhile behind closed doors Ron still would show up on the sidelines.   

For all Ron's flaws, I do think he had a pretty good style and approach overall.  Toughest behind the scenes.  Believed in creating a player centric locker room and looking for those types.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

I also feel stoic Ron.....was a lot tougher than credited for.   He didn't do the sideline theatrics.  But every once in awhile behind closed doors Ron still would show up on the sidelines.   

For all Ron's flaws, I do think he had a pretty good style and approach overall.  Toughest behind the scenes.  Believed in creating a player centric locker room and looking for those types.  

Players coach that had discipline and vets respected him.  X and os guy he was not

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I also feel stoic Ron.....was a lot tougher than credited for.   He didn't do the sideline theatrics.  But every once in awhile behind closed doors Ron still would show up on the sidelines.   

For all Ron's flaws, I do think he had a pretty good style and approach overall.  Toughest behind the scenes.  Believed in creating a player centric locker room and looking for those types.  

Ron was a scary dude when he was pissed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

Ron was a scary dude when he was pissed

and I don't think he got enough credit for really getting a NFL locker room.  I mean he came up in a tough one himself.  I don't think it was pure luck how his teams became to be in the end.   Lot of frankly old school personality types all magically ended up with Ron. 

Ron probably will always be my favorite coach here even with his warts. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

and I don't think he got enough credit for really getting a NFL locker room.  I mean he came up in a tough one himself.  I don't think it was pure luck how his teams became to be in the end.   Lot of frankly old school personality types all magically ended up with Ron. 

Ron probably will always be my favorite coach here even with his warts. 

Yeah, Ron's only real flaw as a coach was lack of adaptability. He and Shula both basically came up with a game plan and usually a pretty good one at that but if it didn't work there was no plan B or C. We're just gonna keep doubling down on A and hope it eventually starts working.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Canales' is great driving the positive energy but he's just not going to instill the "we will pummel you into submission" mentality many like to see.  I would love to see him with a bit less guardrails at times, let himself really come out-- want to know how he is when he's ticked off/wanting to bleed.  For now, we've got Dennis Morton in the house.  

I guess that's where the assistants and team leaders come in the time being.  I'd personally like to see a few guys that bring that no-prisoners mentality within our personnel.  Usually want it to be a collection of 3-5 that are these clear team-defining leaders. 

The other problem is our best players aren't that type of personality so it sets kind of a bland tone across the board under an enthusiastic HC.  

Hunt & Trevin are the closest thing to tone setters.  

 

Yea IMO it needs to be a LB to be the tone setter on defense....  the beating heart....

 

That said Wallace ain't there yet. 

 

A couple LBs in next years class I hope we get a chance at...

 

Styles 

Barton

Edited by PantherChris
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, CRA said:

I also feel stoic Ron.....was a lot tougher than credited for.   He didn't do the sideline theatrics.  But every once in awhile behind closed doors Ron still would show up on the sidelines.   

For all Ron's flaws, I do think he had a pretty good style and approach overall.  Toughest behind the scenes.  Believed in creating a player centric locker room and looking for those types.  

Bingo.  Ron was a great coach in so many ways.  With one super frustrating quality-- but it was because he prioritized and really looked to the vets to lead the way.  He saw a little too much in vets that weren't all that great, and locked on for too long.  But man, that guy commanded the team.  Commanded respect and he got crazy intense a few times.  Not the type to get pissed off.  Even with Cam, Luke, TD, he was still driving.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Unfortunately this can happen when you don't have those dawgs that hold everyone, including themselves, accountable. You know damn sure players like Cam, TD, Luke, etc. wouldn't tolerate lack of effort and would chew your ass out if you half-assed it.

Still think we have needed a culture change since Luke retired/Cam's shoulder died. Really need Bryce to be that player

You are right 

we do need that player

At the nfl level, im not sure Bryce is that person    It isnt his dna    

not that kinda leader that pulls team up when it goes not well   

At l least i havent seen it to date 

he must produce this year 


 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

as Morgan would say.....we lack "dawgs". 

I will say, I do think this team/era lacks a certain energy to it.  I don't see the players rostered that provide it.  Canales is a rah rah HC.  Bryce Young is as a laid back as it gets.   I mean, who is the voice on the O side? Who is the voice on the D side? 

I mean, we have some decent players.  But is Derrick Brown going to round up the crew like a Thomas Davis would if things ain't right?  Who is that voice on the O? 

Carolina doesn't have an edge.  I think all teams need a couple players at this level that provide that.  Not just on the field but in house.  That remains a mystery.   Roster full of nice dudes, cashing checks.  We need a couple w/ a screw slightly loose that probably have an unhealthy relationship w/ winning/losing. 

I think it’s going to take a while to change the culture. Fox did it, Rivera carried it on but there has been a huge lack of effort since Rhule. There needs to be turnover at multiple levels, not just the roster to change that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

I think it’s going to take a while to change the culture. Fox did it, Rivera carried it on but there has been a huge lack of effort since Rhule. There needs to be turnover at multiple levels, not just the roster to change that.

A big part of it was fixing the QB position. We found Jake on the trash heap for Fox and Clausen sucked us to Cam for Rivera. If Bryce starts playing like what he was drafted to be a lot of problems will magically seem a lot less dire. Not saying we'll be instantly good but we'll instantly be competitive and more hopeful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They addressed D in free agency in a big way (Edge, ILB) and they signed a starting OT and a player they think could be a swing OT in reserve.  They have claimed to be adding "Weapons" to the offense.  I think that will be their focus.  I agree 100% that we need a T, but a reserve, developmental OT in a weak (at the top) draft does little to address that weakness in 2026.  If they are telling the truth, a reserve developmental OT is not a weapon.  The will draft a WR if that statement and their actions in free agency are accurate.  That does not mean we ignore OT--I just dont see where he takes a T if he is filling holes. As a coach, I am concerned about OT, but when I look at the roster, I see bigger immediate problems. S: We are OK if you want Scott for another season. Not ideal.  There is also talk of Smith-Wade being moved to S.  If so, we need a CBN. DT: Who took Robinson's job?  He played a lot.  All DTs (NT-DE) were average to below average, including 280 lb wharton.  We need a DT (my preference for the first pick, to be honest)  I am guessing a DT will be our third rounder? ILB:  Unless we want Wallace out there in coverage, we need a compliment to Lloyd.  I think Lloyd's starting mate is the second rounder. (speculating)  This pick is likely to occur in the second round because it is for a starting position. WR:  Some are fine with what we have.  sIn 2025, Coker had 3  TDs on 394 yards.  Legette had 3 TDs and 363 yards--and only 1 drop.  I love Coker, but neither should make us feel secure about WR with those numbers.  A lot depends on both stepping up in 2026, but Canales has been screaming weapons.  Could he mean Tight end?  That depends on how good they feel about Coker and XL. Center:  You can get a player ready to start relatively early in the middle rounds.  Very similar to the OT situation but I think C may be more of a priority right now than OT.   Tight End:  They seem to like Delp from Georgia who projects round 4. CB:  There was some talk of moving Smith-Wade to S (to learn for a season with Scott, maybe?) and that might require adding CB depth inside. Tackle?:  I agree that we need one, but this draft is simply not strong at the top at T.  The ONLY way to get a quality OT that is still developmental is to take one in round 1.  Canales has all but said we are not doing that.  But after the first 40 picks or so, they pretty much level out for a good while.  The fifth rounders and the third rounders are about the same.  For that Reason, I am guessing (It is all guesses) that they 
    • Buffalo plays Dallas in the last game. But Dallas has nothing to play for.
×
×
  • Create New...