Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers possibly trading Thielen?


philit99
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Yeah this needs to happen ASAP. I don’t care if the price is lower. These Vikings fans on Twitter are absolutely insufferable. Acting like they have been world beaters for the last 60 years and thinking Carolina should just hand him over for nothing. We’ve had 7 or so tough seasons in a row and we have still been to two superbowls since they have and won more playoff games since 1995. 
 

I hope Dan sends him to Detroit for a 2040 7th rounder and eats half the contract. Even Sheena is replying to them.

They really are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/22/2025 at 10:21 AM, OneBadCat said:

Don’t like the idea. Bryce needs that dude.

Bryce Young needs: Jonathan Mingo (pick 39 in '23), XL (pick 32 in '24), Tet McMillan (pick 8 in '25)....enough already. We made a mistake selling the farm for a short qb with crap wrs and oline, but have gone out of our way since then to help him.  Time to produce.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Yeah this needs to happen ASAP. I don’t care if the price is lower. These Vikings fans on Twitter are absolutely insufferable. Acting like they have been world beaters for the last 60 years and thinking Carolina should just hand him over for nothing. We’ve had 7 or so tough seasons in a row and we have still been to two superbowls since they have and won more playoff games since 1995. 
 

I hope Dan sends him to Detroit for a 2040 7th rounder and eats half the contract. Even Sheena is replying to them.

While Vikings fans have been annoying the past few days wanting AT from us for pennies, we can't hate our purple brothers. We have them to think for NO shitting the bed in the playoffs twice in their peak super bowl chance window. I'll always love them just for the Minneapolis miracle and the meme it provided all of us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

Bryce Young needs: Jonathan Mingo (pick 39 in '23), XL (pick 32 in '24), Tet McMillan (pick 8 in '25)....enough already. We made a mistake selling the farm for a short qb with crap wrs and oline, but have gone out of our way since then to help him.  Time to produce.  

Not sure if you are talking good or bad about Bryce with that statement...

Regardless, this is his prove it year. Even if we don't get wins because our defense is very suspect, we need to look good on offense. If we don't, we are probably moving on

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

Bryce Young needs: Jonathan Mingo (pick 39 in '23), XL (pick 32 in '24), Tet McMillan (pick 8 in '25)....enough already. We made a mistake selling the farm for a short qb with crap wrs and oline, but have gone out of our way since then to help him.  Time to produce.  

I think you're making the opposite of the argument you're trying to.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

I think you're making the opposite of the argument you're trying to.

Not really. My point is that we reached for a qb we shouldn't have when we didn't have the pieces in place for him to succeed. Both of those things can be true at once, especially when you are a dumb franchise.  Regardless, we have bent over backwards to rectify the wr situation and i don't think we need to continue down that path; its make or break time for by.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

Not really. My point is that we reached for a qb we shouldn't have when we didn't have the pieces in place for him to succeed. Both of those things can be true at once, especially when you are a dumb franchise.  Regardless, we have bent over backwards to rectify the wr situation and i don't think we need to continue down that path; its make or break time for by.  

We have had one of the worst groups of skill players in the NFL since he came in the league.  Maybe not this year, we will see, but no one is proven. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...