Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Observer Projections / *Updated Panthers Waiver Additions


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Clemson fan doesn’t know what he’s talking about. 

 

We are returning the best edge the nation (Stewart) and two stars in the backend (Kilgore/DQ Smith) who will be better than Emanwori.

Peak offseason euphoria to think y’all have two safeties better than a guy who just went #35 overall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ECHornet said:

Peak offseason euphoria to think y’all have two safeties better than a guy who just went #35 overall. 

Buddy you clearly didn’t follow Emanworri at SC. He sucked until last year.  
 

We instantly got a boost in performance when Kilgore spelled him - last season was an anomaly.

 

@me in a few months

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Clemson fan doesn’t know what he’s talking about. 

 

We are returning the best edge the nation (Stewart) and two stars in the backend (Kilgore/DQ Smith) who will be better than Emanwori.

I am referencing the fact Stewart is literally the only returning starter on your defensive front 7.   So yeah, the defense taking a step back is something the Gamecocks would be looking at this year as realistic. 

oh, and best in the nation? Not sure he is best in your conference or even your state.  I mean, he is talented.   But maybe you need to bump them breaks on that D. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I am referencing the fact Stewart is literally the only returning starter on your defensive front 7.   So yeah, the defense taking a step back is something the Gamecocks would be looking at this year as realistic. 

 

image.thumb.jpeg.294b18d5a1168e9781e06c7f4e46da5f.jpeg

 

SC’s finest

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, therealmjl said:

image.thumb.jpeg.294b18d5a1168e9781e06c7f4e46da5f.jpeg

 

SC’s finest

I mean, I think that actually is ....the perfect post.  I don't disagree.  That about sums it up on so many levels.   

but best in the nation? He had 6 sacks last year. Not sure he is the consensus best in that conference or state yet.  Lot have the Texas kid and Clemson kid ahead of him as of today.  Depends who you listen to.  But I mean, his potential is through the roof. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

I mean, I think that actually is ....the perfect post.  I don't disagree.  That about sums it up on so many levels.   

but best in the nation? He had 6 sacks last year. Not sure he is the consensus best in that conference or state yet.  Lot have the Texas kid and Clemson kid ahead of him as of today.  Depends who you listen to.  But I mean, his potential is through the roof. 

Yeah I gassed him up. He has star power but needs to put it together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Yeah I gassed him up. He has star power but needs to put it together. 

I like Sellers.  Same reasons I like Cam.  My son has meet him as well over there and liked his whole energy.  Seems like a good dude, so why not pull for him.

but yeah, he is a no good dirty Gamecock at the end of the day and hope he loses every game as well.  I can be both people.  It's the principle of the matter. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

I like Sellers.  Same reasons I like Cam.  My son has meet him as well over there and liked his whole energy.  Seems like a good dude, so why not pull for him.

but yeah, he is a no good dirty Gamecock at the end of the day and hope he loses every game as well.  I can be both people.  It's the principle of the matter. 

Plus the spectacles are awesome.  I'd love it if we drafted him.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Clemson fan doesn’t know what he’s talking about. 

 

We are returning the best edge the nation (Stewart) and two stars in the backend (Kilgore/DQ Smith) who will be better than Emanwori.

The best edge is at Auburn thank you very much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, frankw said:

I like the WR pickup. 6'4 205 caught 8 passes for 147 yards in preseason.

I'd rather have 5'11, 190 lbs, can run routes better than the corners can. 

Why does Canales want jump ball receivers? What is his angle here? Bryce played in a high percentage offense in college, with guys who were both fast and excellent route runners. So he comes here and we do the exact opposite. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

I'd rather have 5'11, 190 lbs, can run routes better than the corners can. 

Why does Canales want jump ball receivers? What is his angle here? Bryce played in a high percentage offense in college, with guys who were both fast and excellent route runners. So he comes here and we do the exact opposite. 

We have that. His name is Jimmy Horn Jr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

I'd rather have 5'11, 190 lbs, can run routes better than the corners can. 

Why does Canales want jump ball receivers? What is his angle here? Bryce played in a high percentage offense in college, with guys who were both fast and excellent route runners. So he comes here and we do the exact opposite. 

Because Canales runs a chunk ball O scheme.  It’s what he did in Tampa.  What he did in Seattle.   And he largely is just going to be that.   

he acquires talent that fits that 

and Bryce Young will never fit that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Frank got a dude forced on him who couldn't do NFL basics.   And we know factually, NFL coaches often are made to do things.  We know often they don't get there way.  That's called having a job and a boss.    Those aren't excuses.  People make up this mythical NFL world.  Canales LITERALLY ended Bryce's Young's career here 2 games into the Canales era.  That is the reality.  Then there was that miracle climb out of the grave stupidity that Dan Morgan allowed by not solving the issue like the entire sports world was debating (where would he be traded to and for how much).   The "benching to fix him" narrative is comical PR.  Every year it's the same poo.  Obvious problems are obvious.  But we do all these mental gymnastics to pretend the obvious isn't the obvious.  It's well documented.  The problem was Matt Rhule.  Majority of the board spent years spinning it elsewhere.  Then the obvious problem was Fitterer.  Repeat.  Board spent years spinning it elsehwere and deflecting.  Obvious problem right now is Bryce Young and the front office that refuses to admit they made one of the worst moves in the history of the NFL.  Because when it is finally said and done.....THAT will be a fact.   And that fact, will be attached to resume of a lot of people presently employed in the front office of BOA.  The main problem is not Canales.  And I don't blame him for not trying to win every game he possibly can as ugly as possible in spite of Bryce Young.  That carries too high of odds of keeping the main problem the main problem....and screws Canales in the end.   Canales will be fired next season if he can't get this group to move off Bryce Young.  That's the easiest thing to see. 
    • The squandering of a genuinely good haul of draft picks was abysmal.  Scott Fitterer.
×
×
  • Create New...