Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Parsons to Green Bay


PantherChris
 Share

Recommended Posts

Haven't read through the thread, but seems like a pretty bad deal for Dallas. The Packers were already a pretty good team so those two 1sts are likely to be late in the round, then you get an aging DT whose production fell off a cliff last year that you're probably gonna cut after this season to avoid the ballooning cap hits in his contract. Doesn't really feel like they "got" him as much as the Packers got rid of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Haven't read through the thread, but seems like a pretty bad deal for Dallas. The Packers were already a pretty good team so those two 1sts are likely to be late in the round, then you get an aging DT whose production fell off a cliff last year that you're probably gonna cut after this season to avoid the ballooning cap hits in his contract. Doesn't really feel like they "got" him as much as the Packers got rid of him.

2 first round picks for a player you were unwilling to spend half your cap space on.

Seems a decent, if not ideal, deal. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, carpanfan96 said:

5 year 202m deal with an apy of slightly above 40m, he wanted to be the highest paid non QB and the Dallas deal wouldn't accomplish that. 

I'm just saying, it's not like they weren't willing to pay him an absolute poo ton. Trading him for less than we turned down from the Rams for Brian Burns seems like a kick in the teeth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm just saying, it's not like they weren't willing to pay him an absolute poo ton. Trading him for less than we turned down from the Rams for Brian Burns seems like a kick in the teeth. 

Scott Fitterer is one of the worst GM's in the history of the NFL. It's not even hyperbole, he should be in the Hall of Shame if there was such a thing - his goiter neck prominently displayed on his bust carved from hardened pig sh*t. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

But the NBA did rig the draft for them though. I don’t feel bad for them at all

The NBA is infamous for that poo. There have been way too many draft lotteries play out way too conveniently for there not to be some smoke.

That trade package for Luka made zero sense on the surface for the Mavs but makes a lot more sense if there was a wink/nod backroom deal that the #1 overall pick was coming back there way with the most hyped prospect since Wemby on the board. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://nfltraderumors.co/2026-nfl-draft-grades-for-all-32-teams/      Grade: B+ Best Pick: Sam Hecht Biggest Reach (consensus rank): Jackson Kuwatch (NR) It's easy to love what Carolina did. The Panthers traded four times but ended the draft with the same number of selections that they started with and in approximately the same ranges. They did not take a player ahead of the consensus until Kuwatch at No. 227, and it's easy to see how he fell through the cracks playing at Miami of Ohio. He's a high-end athlete, though, and has a chance to develop, which is a fine profile for a seventh-rounder. Freeling and Brazzell also checked the high-end athleticism upside boxes for the Panthers. Carolina let the board come to them in the first round and could have a long-term solution at left tackle, which is a hard position to fill. Brazzell slid because of some maturity concerns as well as the difficulty in projecting receivers from Tennessee's Mickey Mouse offense. At 6-4, 200 pounds and 4.37 in the 40, though, the upside is undeniable. On top of that, the landed three starters on Day 3. Normally that's a high and unrealistic bar, but Hecht and Wheatley were both firmly inside the top 100 on the consensus board and have paths to win starting competitions. Lee fits the scheme well and has some interesting traits as an outside corner. What stopped me from a full-out A grade is not loving the Hunter pick, though he does fill a need to replace DT A'Shawn Robinson. There were prospects at other needs positions I would have been more jazzed about. The Brazzell pick is also an interesting risk for a team that's still in building mode, even coming off an NFC South title. Still, I'm nitpicking
    • I was just a teenager when I joined in 2013. I've loved the many opinions on this forum, even though several are infuriating. I've had several bad takes, myself,  that I've hopefully grown out of over the years.
    • i have not watched many gt games.  is it his accuracy that hurt his draft stock his armstrength or all of the above?
×
×
  • Create New...