Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coker to IR; Renfrow signed to 53


amcoolio
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

This is what I was saying earlier. He wants to play close to home. Honestly same as AT playing in Minnesota (except he was contracted to play here). People have to let things fully unfold before they start whining. Regardless I doubt HR will have as good of a year as some think. I see him as a clutch 3rd down guy and a nice vet to mentor these young WRs. 

 I think how good of year Hunter has boils down to Canales’ scheme and playcalling.   If he just runs the stuff he did  last year and asks him to run ATs routes….Hunter won’t do much 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Tbe said:


He said his conditioning in camp was a problem and the plan was for him to go to the PS to work on that. When the Adam thing happened, they decided to have him join the 53. The plan is still for him to work on his conditioning for the time being. He may be inactive or he may just play a few times here and there.

Canales said it was a concern when he was justifying all his roster moves. Which I still say you can’t  take what coaches say as the gospel when they are explaining things on a mic.

Hunter said we got games coming up, so I guess we will see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, CRA said:

 I think how good of year Hunter has boils down to Canales’ scheme and playcalling.   If he just runs the stuff he did  last year and asks him to run ATs routes….Hunter won’t do much 

I know you are happy your guy is on the roster and will get playing time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I know you are happy your guy is on the roster and will get playing time. 

Much like Bryce though….not sure Hunter really fits Dave.  So, just for the record it’s not me picking on Bryce with fit of scheme 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

Much like Bryce though….not sure Hunter really fits Dave.  So, just for the record it’s not me picking on Bryce with fit of scheme 

I think he could be a nice reliable 3rd down target. Let him find the soft spots in the defense. XL and TMac should handle the outside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

Canales said it was a concern when he was justifying all his roster moves. Which I still say you can’t  take what coaches say as the gospel when they are explaining things on a mic.

Hunter said we got games coming up, so I guess we will see. 


No, that’s what Hunter said. I know DC said something similar, but hunter gave more detail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/31/2025 at 11:41 PM, ProcessBlue2 said:

Yeah but the guys that stepped up when KB left were veterans well into their careers.

Ted “no hands” Ginn and his sidekick Grandpa Cotchery. 

No lie… to this day, and forever, I’m always still gonna love me some Ted Ginn.  I tell people all the time who aren’t Panther fans so they don’t know - Ted legit was our best receiver during Cam’s tenure here.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Tbe said:


No, that’s what Hunter said. I know DC said something similar, but hunter gave more detail.

Yeah, the recent interview in front of his locker….

if you listen, Hunter regurgitates what Canales said and does it from Canales’ perspective.  Coach said,  coach thought, Coach wanted. 

Every year I explain my position that coaches are not truthful people when it comes to explaining decisions and what is going on….they aren’t in the business of letting us know what is going on behind the scenes.   Nothing ever supported what Dave was selling.  He saw something apparently no one covering the team every single day saw.  He kept his boy and had to have a reason to explain it at the end of the day….and saying Moore was better would not sell

Hunter never had said he believed such is what I am saying.  That was Dave BSing his roster decisions.  What coaches do.  Hunter doesn’t play OL.  Odds are with his select slot work and his role….he is better prepared than our lineman for week 1.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of our current offensive system is spreading guys out, running 4 or 5 wide and letting Bryce find the best matchups presnap.  

Hunter is elite at settling in a zone and running underneath routes.  

I see both as good fits for our scheme.  

Hunter was originally signed at 1 mil for the year.  Now, it's 2 mil.  Absolutely nothing unusual with the whole process especially since from the start we knew he was only going to play for us.

If we'd kept AT, it was up to Hunter if being on the practice squad was inline with his playing goals this year.  When we traded AT that gives Hunter the chance he wanted.

None of this stuff is done on a whim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes I to account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as a treading water year. I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. 
    • What happened to King? Was he a no show?
    • think these smaller Qb's are going to have a much harder time convincing an NFL team to draft them. not saying a smaller Qb under 6 feet tall will not make an NFL roster .it will most likely be a UDFA contract more or less prove it deal.NFL teams have been burnt time & time again investing in these small NFL Qbs & i think  teams are now finally starting to realize that investing in these smaller Qb's under 6 feet tall is simply a bad idea  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...