Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremy Folwer: Panthers inquired about trading for Micah Parsons


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would have made that deal. I know they play different positions, but Parsons would have got us more sacks in one season than DB has in his entire career. I think Brown is a good player, not a great one. I know that opinion isn't popular around here. But ask any team in the NFL who makes more of an impact on the field week in and week out...DB or Parsons? I think over 2/3 of the teams would have picked the latter.

Edited by SCO96
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SCO96 said:

I would have made that deal. I know they play different positions, but Parsons would have got us more sacks in one season than DB has in his entire career. I think Brown is a good player, not a great one. I know that opinion isn't popular around here. But ask any team in the NFL who makes more of an impact on the field week in and week out...DB or Parsons? I over 2/3 of the teams would have picked the latter.

You don't know what the deal was?  If it was DB and 2 1sts plus you pay that contract, you would have done it?  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

You don't know what the deal was?  If it was DB and 2 1sts plus you pay that contract, you would have done it?  

I actually had forgotten the part about the Two #1 picks.  Thanks for reminding me. So the answer to your question would be a resounding NO!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, toldozer said:

And paid him damn near 50 million dollars? Hard pass, Jerry Jones actually made the correct decision 

I was looking at it from a straight up swap and one #1 pick (see my reply to Jimmy). Parsons isn't worth that the Packers gave up. And, that $47 mil is pretty steep (although that will probably seem like a bargain in 2 seasons). I confess my error. 

That said, I still think Parson is a more impactful player on the field week in and week out than Brown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SCO96 said:

I was looking at it from a straight up swap and one #1 pick (see my reply to Jimmy). Parsons isn't worth that the Packers gave up. And, that $47 mil is pretty steep (although that will probably seem like a bargain in 2 seasons). I confess my error. 

That said, I still think Parson is a more impactful player on the field week in and week out than Brown.

Yeah I don't think anyone will argue Parsons over DB.  It's everything else involved.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...