Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OFFICIAL Week 1: Panthers @ Jaguars Game Day Thread


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, fanpanther said:

If u take away the 2 young turnovers the score would have been 16 to 10 a much closer game.  If u untrade theilen panthers would have probably won the game today. Also trever lawrence is not a good qb and the jags are not a good nfl team.

But he did turn it over twice, and got lucky the pick 6 didn't count. And the Jags aren't a good NFL team, but still stomped us. I'll let you figure out the rest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, NAS said:

Yes first quarter of first game of year 3, why don’t we see how the rest of it goes before we say it’s over

Remember how all these people in here were so wrong about Bryce late last year.  It changes week to week around here

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, frankw said:

I agree about his coaching style and personality. The youth pastor thing needs to go. It will not work with this franchise.

It also certainly stings that Canales just got throttled by Liam Coen who was his replacement in Tampa Bay last year. The same guy who also got roasted for that cringe attempt at doing a Duval chant.

We'll know who Canales really is very soon regardless. He's made his own bed. And Morgan should not get a pass in any way shape or form either. He deserves all the smoke too.

"We need some dogs" said the man with the school counselor coach and devout therapist son QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Moonraker said:

But he did turn it over twice, and got lucky the pick 6 didn't count. And the Jags aren't a good NFL team, but still stomped us. I'll let you figure out the rest

I has totally forgotten about the pic six that should have been.  My post wasnt a byoung defense post he sucks.  It was more of a statement of how if he had just not turned it over and the panthers had not traded theilen they probably would have won the game today against a terrible team.  But looking at the game today I do feel the panthers have a good enough supporting cast that if they had a good qb would be a good offense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What’s funny is a lot of (not all) the people who didn’t want a retread HC are the ones complaining about Canales.

-Mike McCarthy- did decent up until leaving Dallas

-Sean Payton- Playoffs first season with Broncos

-Dan Quinn- NFC Championship Game first season with Commanders

-Jim Harbaugh- Playoffs first year with Chargers

but “oh no” we didn’t want them here. 

 

Edited by ProcessBlue2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

What’s funny is a lot of (not all) the people who didn’t want a retread HC are the ones complaining about Canales.

-Mike McCarthy- did decent up until leaving Dallas

-Sean Payton- Playoffs first season with Broncos

-Dan Quinn- NFC Championship Game first season with Commanders

-Jim Harbaugh- Playoffs first year with Chargers

but “oh no” we didn’t want them here. 

 

So true.  I would love to have Jim, Dan, or Sean here.  So sick of stinking it up for the first 8 games and then fixing things just to make sure we dont have a top draft pick so we have to trade the farm if we want a top pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No PFF grades up yet but the all-22 is up.

Just watched the first passing play (Q1 6:45) from 3rd & 2 on the CAR 37 where Bryce scrambled for the first. Dowdle whiffed going low on the blitzing Oluokun, which forced Bryce to scramble. If not for that, that ball was going to XL on a corner route that he'd have been open. Concerning though that Bryce looked like he was staring the route down (which he definitely did on the first INT of the day).

This doesn't absolve Bryce as he made several flat out bad plays throughout the game. Also rather damning is that of the 40 drop backs, according to the filters there was pressure on 16 vs. 24 w/o pressure... though I'm questioning the validity of the early filters because the very first play I mentioned is flagged as "no pressure" when there's very clearly pressure.

The first INT was a bad play by Bryce. He thought Murray had started dropping deep to cover Brycen Tremayne, but Murray read Bryce's eyes the whole time which stayed on XL. Murray "broke the rule" here and made a play, but he also wouldn't have made that play had Bryce not been staring XL down for most of the route.

 

Might not get an all-22 review post up until later in the week. I've got a conference next week that I'm prepping for and the family is still reeling from one of our pets passing over the weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...