Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could probably get Jameis for pennies


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd be for making a move for someone like Jameis or Howell and here's why... they've shown they can produce they've just had turnover issues. So bring them in so that we can better evaluate the rest of our offensive roster. If they fix their turnover issues then maybe we're not completely desperate for QB heading into the draft. If they don't, then we're gonna keep losing anyway so whatever.

Just ignore that it's already been explained to get triggered by a college team you don't like.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upside: it wouldn't take much to be better than Young and help build up or evaluate the other guys on the roster.

Downside: they still are not very good so lots of turnovers and not many more wins. 

How long they go before having this conversation is what I want to see. Was it even ever on the list of allowed actions too. It looks like today, NE and maybe Miami if they are as bad as they appear are the only games they have a chance at winning so it's never going to be about the wins. I never liked Jamis but even he brings more to the table than what we got. Not sure on Howell but it's hard to belive anyone is worse than what they have on the roster currently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The only time Sanders looked good was against our camp bodies.

Not exactly true. I read in several places how Sanders looked like he may be the best out of the bunch during the Browns training camp. Minimally, many Browns fans and analysts were saying that he deserved more reps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

I don’t think Morgan and Canales were planning on winning a lot of games, they’re still in re-build mode. They will let Bryce play out this season and evaluate him afterwards. Only problem with replacing him is I don’t really see much talent in college.

The 2026 QB class is expected to be deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Upside: it wouldn't take much to be better than Young and help build up or evaluate the other guys on the roster.

Downside: they still are not very good so lots of turnovers and not many more wins. 

See, I don't even see that as a downside. If they came here and didn't fix their turnover issues we'd still keep losing but actually have a better ability to evaluate our other offensive skill position players.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...