Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defense is turning around?


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Want to know something even better? New England has the 2nd most turnovers this season

Both Carolina and NE are top 5 in % of drives that result in a turnover

that will be the game. Who doesn’t lose it 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Both Carolina and NE are top 5 in % of drives that result in a turnover

that will be the game. Who doesn’t lose it 

I was trying to be optimistic and left us out. If I recall the list correctly, Dallas, Miami, and NYJ are right there with us and NE. Like you say, whoever takes care of the football better will probably win those games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davidson Deac II said:

We also don't know what we are.  In the first two games, turnovers killed us, and made the defense look worse than it actually was.  We also have a lot of new guys learning their roles.  During the first game, I listened to the Radio broadcast, and Luke basically said that our defense was pretty good when playing straight up, but got confused and out of place when the offense motioned.  I think that is due to young/inexperienced players on defense, especially at linebacker.  

I was including us. I am not a Bryce guy but am not unable to see what the offense could look like if he played well, even given his limitations. 

And the defense for sure has a chance to get better quick with these young guys. 
And if we can get any decent LB play. I hear Wallace has done a 180, which he sure needed to do. Hope it isn’t a mirage. 
 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Navy_football said:

What in the hell is Rozeboom doing there? Why didn't he just shoot the gap under the double team?! 

That was bad. He completely over pursed when the edge was already set and left a gaping cut back lane. If we get a late top 10 pick, I wouldn’t mind if we traded down some and draft the best MLB in the draft. Most likely Anthony Hill Jr from Texas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said it in the around the NFL thread, but I will repeat it here. 

 

For Baltimore, MLB Trenton Simpson has seen his snap counts dwindle to a handful of plays the last two weeks. He seems to have fallen out of favor being replaced by the new rookie. No idea what it would cost, but I hope Dan is at least reaching out to gauge interest in moving him. Don't want to spend the boat on him, but if he can be had for cheap he would be a great injection of potential at the LB level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Swaggasaurus said:

Too soon to say. Health of Jaycee, Mike Jack, and Brown is going to be huge. It’s been huge the past few years and will continue to be until we draft better players. Luckily I think Scourton and Princely might be good enough to be in the way of offenses year one and maybe grow into playmakers in the future. I still think there are 4 better inside backers working at Walmart than what we have on this roster.

Trevin Wallace’s is just alright, he made more plays this week. But Rozeboom is a really bad tackler. Like how is that your job in the pros and you’re that bad. If we get one good ILB then we are set

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Wait...so you finally give evero a lil bit of talent to work with and you see some improvement?? You dont say...

They fuged him over so bad to help cover their bad judgement.

About time he got a little something to wrk with. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, cranky said:

I've never been an Evero fan but ignoring all the BY noise, I can't help but notice that they have been fairly solid so far this year. Not perfect, but definetly heading in the right direction. Hopefully they will keep it up and I can post a big apology to him at the end if the season. 

 

 

550769651_18532996609003040_5830007519032230823_n (1).jpg

Falcons offense was the easiest to gameplay for. 90% of the time they are in shotgun its a pass. Their plays were dictated by same formations. This made it easier to gameplan for out of all of our opponents. NE will let us know if we made any progress with our coordinators preparation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, cranky said:

The Jags are 2-1, the Cardinals are 2-1 only losing to the 49's at the last second and the Falcons scored 22 and 20 against the Vikings and Bucs the two weeks prior to the Panthers. Not sure I would consider any of them trash.

Penix was straight trash Sunday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales’ recipe for success is simple — slow the game down with long drives that keep the other team’s offense off the field. Long drives are built from short gains but short gains require more 3rd-down conversions.  The Panthers are converting 37.5% of their third downs, which is average but not enough. As a result, they have attempted 21 fourth downs — the most in the NFL — and they’ve converted 71.4% of them, ranking 3rd among teams with at least 15 attempts. The Chiefs are second @ 80% and the Colts are first at 88% but the majority of their conversions are short yardage runs - not passes.  The Panthers have had three big wins this season — against Miami, the Cowboys, and the Packers — those conversions have played a major role in each of those wins. Miami The Panthers trailed by 17 in the 2nd quarter, facing a 4th-and-5 at the Miami 48. Young threw a 21-yard completion and they went on to score 7 on that drive. Then in the 4th, down by 4, they faced another 4th-and-5 at the Miami 33. Young delivered a 17-yard completion for the 1st down and they went on to score the winning TD. Cowboys The game is tied and the Panthers take over at their own 14 with 6 minutes left. Rico picks up 16 yards and Young converts two 3rd downs, gaining 37 yards, but misses on a third conversion. At the Cowboys’ 40, facing a 4th-and-4 at the 2-minute mark — knowing the Cowboys likely score if they get the ball back — Canales has them go for it. Young converts with a 7-yard pass putting them at the 33 in FG range. They then go on to kicj the game winning FG. Packers Young was 2-for-2 on 4th-down attempts. Then on the final drive starting from their own 19 with the score tied, Young converts two 3rd downs for 19 yards and Rico adds another 19 to move them into field-goal range for the win. In total, Bryce went 2-for-4 on 3rd downs and 5-for-5 on 4th downs on critical plays in those games. When the Panthers needed 1 yard against the Packers on their own 41 early in the game, Canales went to Young. - not Rico. When they needed 4 yards to keep the drive going at the 2 minute mark against the Cowboys he went to Young. Those throws weren’t empty-yardage completions; they were high-pressure, must-convert moments that directly contributed to all three wins. I keep reading how the Panthers  are winning in spite of Young, that Canales doesn’t trust him and schemes around him. But these drives show the opposite: when the game is on the line, Canales has consistently put the ball in Young’s hands and Young has consistently produced in those moments.  Some people do well in normal situations but crumble under pressure. Others can be uneven in normal times but produce when the presure is greatest. The question is who would you rather have in the playoffs. More importantly, who do you think Canales and the FO would want?  
    • I think is worse news for Tremayne. They need special teams help with him questionable.  If T-Mac is down, XL, Coker, Horn, and Renfrow. No way Chisena gets meaningful snaps as WR, only on special teams. 
×
×
  • Create New...