Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales and Mike White


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Banking your hopes on a couch FA that has a cup of tea NFL career to date as an almost 31 year old QB is certainly something. Especially when you consider that he has spent literally zero time in our offense so far.

I think that White might be solid competition and possibly be better than Hendon Hooker, which is certainly a very low bar to clear. 

That's probably about where the level is for White. He's a potential upgrade to our PS QB.

For real. Where is Brian St. Pierre when you need him? He is probably still looking for his arm that fell off after one game with Foxy.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If things go south for us in the 2nd half of the season I wouldn't mind seeing Hooker.  Dude has a big arm and is somewhat mobile.  Maybe under Canales he has learned something.

I just don't think Dalton is going to get us anywhere.  We need to run the ball against Buffalo and keep the Bills offense off the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now we have four teams in front of us likely to take a qb (Jets, Dolphins, Browns, Raiders) and about three (Mendoza IU, Moore UO, Simpson Bama) good looking prospects. I guess we could take one from the second tier (Sellers USC, Beck UM, Nussmeir LSU) with our second pick.  White does nothing for our long term need at the position.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rebelrouser said:

Right now we have four teams in front of us likely to take a qb (Jets, Dolphins, Browns, Raiders) and about three (Mendoza IU, Moore UO, Simpson Bama) good looking prospects. I guess we could take one from the second tier (Sellers USC, Beck UM, Nussmeir LSU) with our second pick.  White does nothing for our long term need at the position.  

I would disagree about how many "good" QB's are in this draft. Not really one I would say that is worth investing draft capital on a QB in the first three rounds. 

We will see closer to the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, csx said:

Mayfield was #1 overall and brought the Browns to the playoffs.

This is glossed over so easily.  He took the Browns to the playoffs.  Is it any wonder that once he got to a competent organization he’s playing at an MVP level?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

If things go south for us in the 2nd half of the season I wouldn't mind seeing Hooker.  Dude has a big arm and is somewhat mobile.  Maybe under Canales he has learned something.

I just don't think Dalton is going to get us anywhere.  We need to run the ball against Buffalo and keep the Bills offense off the field. 

You are talking about a tanking scenario. That's not really what I would think we would want to end the year on with the morale actually being pretty good for the first time in a while, so it seems.

Hooker will definitely assure that no more close games or wins happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You are talking about a tanking scenario. That's not really what I would think we would want to end the year on with the morale actually being pretty good for the first time in a while, so it seems.

Hooker will definitely assure that no more close games or wins happen.

Yes. Morgan and Canales are too far in to tank. They have to show progression. And to finish 5-12 or 6-11 after starting 4-3 will almost certainly get them fired. Hooker gives you very little chance to win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ProcessBlue2 said:

Yes. Morgan and Canales are too far in to tank. They have to show progression. And to finish 5-12 or 6-11 after starting 4-3 will almost certainly get them fired. Hooker gives you very little chance to win. 

IDK if they will get fired but it would be a bad look. I do think Tepper will give DC until mid-next year to get results acceptable to him, whatever the fug that might be.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Pantherxtreme said:

Remember him from a few seasons ago, lively arm and mobile.

No qb has been successful with the Jets so you can't hold that against him. 

And it’s possible no QB will ever be successful here lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rebelrouser said:

Right now we have four teams in front of us likely to take a qb (Jets, Dolphins, Browns, Raiders) and about three (Mendoza IU, Moore UO, Simpson Bama) good looking prospects. I guess we could take one from the second tier (Sellers USC, Beck UM, Nussmeir LSU) with our second pick.  White does nothing for our long term need at the position.  

You can't just throw a first round pick at a QB because you need a QB. 

Edited by OldhamA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Yes. Morgan and Canales are too far in to tank. They have to show progression. And to finish 5-12 or 6-11 after starting 4-3 will almost certainly get them fired. Hooker gives you very little chance to win. 

Depends how they get to that 6-11 record. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...