Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If they trade Dowdle…


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

I feel bad for Chuba and bad for thinking it, but i’ve started to wonder if maybe he was as good as he appeared to be because we had no other good options.  You know?  Slow-and-steady-wins-the-race-type-thing?  Because the poo we’ve seen the last two weeks is horrible.  I saw someone tweet earlier that the current alternating series strategy limits both from their strengths - Rico’s fast, explosive hard runs, and Chuba’s ability to churn until he gains momentum.  I just don’t fuging understand what Canales is doing.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, strato said:

That has to be water under the bridge at this point. Just hope they learn from it. 
I have always said I think that was maybe a mandated thing. Not specifically take him but you help Bryce at all costs, priority number one we can fix other poo later. 
But that doesn’t matter anymore either. 

We will see if it matters. Especially if Bryce sticks around for several years. 

It may always be "help Bryce at all costs."

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TD alt said:

It would be just another signal of profound incompetence: a can't see the forest for the trees type of thing. But, then again, that's what happens when you can't see the forest for the trees. There was really no need to pay Chuba all that money when backs like Dowdle were on the market in the first place. I've always said that Chuba is better than many thought, but his specialty (if you will) is taking what the defense gives you, it was never really about being dynamic enough to be paid a big contract. We overpaid him in my opinion.

We paid chuba because he was the catalyst for the offense once bryce came back from the benching. He needs a run game to succeed and chuba was the guy last year like Rico is this year to help. It was all about stability. No different then us overpaying for a o line to help bryce. 

All these moves didnt sound dumb a first but after time goes by they start getting put under a microscope. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Sucks we can’t trade Chuba. Nobody wants an average rb on a horrible contract. 

There are ways to deal with the contract and some team in need may not be able to be picky. He hasn’t looked that good this year but he has produced in the past, pretty consistently. 

After today I wonder if we could trade him for a guard with a similar contract or something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CPF4LIFE said:

We paid chuba because he was the catalyst for the offense once bryce came back from the benching. He needs a run game to succeed and chuba was the guy last year like Rico is this year to help. It was all about stability. No different then us overpaying for a o line to help bryce. 

All these moves didnt sound dumb a first but after time goes by they start getting put under a microscope. 

It is just like if we brought a QB in and he made Bryce look like he should be demoted. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

We paid chuba because he was the catalyst for the offense once bryce came back from the benching. He needs a run game to succeed and chuba was the guy last year like Rico is this year to help. It was all about stability. No different then us overpaying for a o line to help bryce. 

All these moves didnt sound dumb a first but after time goes by they start getting put under a microscope. 

I mean, that sounds good. I will say that I kind of cringe when people say we overpaid for for an O-line because if you want the best players, or even quality players on the O-line, you're going to have to pay. They were proven players, one arguably the best at his position in football, so you're going to back up the Brinks truck. I don't see it as overpaying as much as I see it shifting your priorities in light of your situation and market conditions. 

Now with an RB, those generally are easier to get and easier to replace, especially if you have a good O-line. We could've let Chuba walk and still kept rolling a lot easier than continuing to roll the dice on backups starting on the O-line. I can't even remember who was available, but I'd bet that there was someone available who could replace Chuba's production.

That being said, we've been told in this thread that Chuba's contract was structured in a way that facilitates minimal pain if we decide to move on from him. If that's so, then it was smart and someone in the FO had a little foresight (and probably understands the PR side of things, as well as the pure numbers side). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stopped watching after the first series in the second half because losing to better teams  is one thing, but blowouts? 

.and those blowouts happen far too often …they are becoming his MO as HC against better teams 

Against the 31st run defense in the league,   he came out throwing….who didn’t know that was going to happen.

   Throwing against a team that was ranked 31st against the run is mind boggling when the Panthers strength is running the ball   Add to it, the Bills are excellent against the pass 

His personnel packages are totally predictable  (Horn)   where were the TEs today…can they only run two types of patterns to the receivers? 

he makes no adjustments for what he sees on the field 

.He appears to have  zero game day control or communication with Evero.  

Canales single handedly neutered  a player that had 400 plus yards in 2 games ….that takes some real genius there.  

I read he was ‘researching’ how to use 2 running backs effectively

i mean, for  fug sake, are you kidding me.  Hand the ball to Rico. When he gets tired, bring in Hubbard.  This is not hard 

I feel sorry for the Panthers fans who  sat through that today  

 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, strato said:

There are ways to deal with the contract and some team in need may not be able to be picky. He hasn’t looked that good this year but he has produced in the past, pretty consistently. 

After today I wonder if we could trade him for a guard with a similar contract or something. 

I think Chuba felt pressured to return from injury maybe sooner than he wanted to make sure he didn’t lose his job 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, strato said:

There are ways to deal with the contract and some team in need may not be able to be picky. He hasn’t looked that good this year but he has produced in the past, pretty consistently. 

After today I wonder if we could trade him for a guard with a similar contract or something. 

His contract isn't that bad. We can get out after 2026 and before the cap hits go up substantially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brooks isn't anything worth putting hope into at this point, that dude can'tbe relyed on until he can stay healthy for any period of time. If that is your answer then you have already failed.

If they trade Rico and Hubbard misses any more time then the wheels would come off worse than yesterday. They need him and DC needs to figure it out. Play Rico and spell him with Hubbard. If Hubbard doesn't like it then he can carry that chip into his runs. This team goes as well as it's running and it needs a ridiculous amount at that to carry the QB play and spell the D. Everything was exposed yesterday when they got hit in the mouth from the opponents run game. That's what they need to do to other teams if they want any amount of success the rest of the season.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, hepcat said:

I think Chuba felt pressured to return from injury maybe sooner than he wanted to make sure he didn’t lose his job 

I said that too, elsewhere - last week and yesterday when it came up about maybe he wasn’t 100% because he didn’t look that good. 
I don’t know how you watch Rico dominating two consecutive weeks and don’t be scared you are getting Wally Pipped. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, toldozer said:

They aren't trading him unless it's for a 3rd or higher

Well they better sign him to a decent deal or he walks this year, and we get nothing for him. Actually they could get the same for Chuba and let it be known that Dowdle is our #1 back. I like him but I doubt he will be here next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For starters, and again I am not sure what his capacity is in the media or how connected he is to the team, but I posted above Al Wallace says he is "absolutely" getting 50+ a year and he deserves it.  I obviously strongly disagree with it but it feels like like season when the team is slow leaking info to gauge the temp.   Secondly nobody on Gods green earth is going to sign an extension making less than he is making now.  Thats just crazy talk.  
    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
×
×
  • Create New...