Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Canales digging his own grave?


DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, joeyxfresco said:

I’d love to get a seasoned OC or Assistant HC for Canales. I feel like he’s doing a good job he just needs someone next to him to help him around some of the non-coaching parts of the gig that he may not quite get yet. People forget that a lot of McVays success came from having Wade Phillips to teach him how to be a HC

mike mcdaniel come on down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just about everyone I have ever seen that was a first time HC, mostly successful coordinators, said there was stuff they couldn’t have imagined. 
Canales only had one season as a coordinator. A steep learning curve should be expected. Help in the form of a mentor would have been a good idea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/28/2025 at 11:30 AM, raleigh-panther said:

Don’t disagree 

He inherited Young

However, consider the decision to not get a better backup QB and practice squad QB falls squarely  on him   He is both HC and OC 

it isn't like he doesn't see Dalton everyday for  the past 2 years 

Who was there to be had that is CHEAPER, AND ALSO BETTER than Dalton...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strato said:

Just about everyone I have ever seen that was a first time HC, mostly successful coordinators, said there was stuff they couldn’t have imagined. 
Canales only had one season as a coordinator. A steep learning curve should be expected. Help in the form of a mentor would have been a good idea. 

He has former head coaches on staff. Capers and Caldwell

Edited by amcoolio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

Who was there to be had that is CHEAPER, AND ALSO BETTER than Dalton...

It's not just about being cheaper. Dalton was washed last year. So saying who's better is just a lame argument because it's not even trying to do anything. Who was available? 

Daniel Jones at 14m

Jacoby Brissett @ 6.25m

Jameis @ 4m

Flacco @ 4.25m

Rudolph @ 3.75m

Lance @ 2m

Or we could have tried to trade for Howell, who though he played badly his one season starting in Washington was behind a sieve of an offensive line with no running game. 

There were options. We didnt have to go with Dalton, but he was comfortable and no challenge to Bryce or a threat to the starting job which is what I think Tepper ultimately wanted. 

Even if we didnt get better than Dalton, judging by what we saw Sunday, would it have been much worse? So we lose by 40 instead of 30. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't a fan of the Canales hire, but the Panthers didn't exactly have people lining up to coach this dumpster fire under Tepper.  I think Canales is doing a decent job with a talent depleted roster and not much cap room.  It is pretty crazy how many rookies and 2nd year players that have key roles with this team.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, jtm said:

I wasn't a fan of the Canales hire, but the Panthers didn't exactly have people lining up to coach this dumpster fire under Tepper.  I think Canales is doing a decent job with a talent depleted roster and not much cap room.  It is pretty crazy how many rookies and 2nd year players that have key roles with this team.  

I think we are at the point where people are looking for reasons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m all for giving Dave more time for roster maturation and whatnot, but he has already shown me he’s more rah-rah and less nutsack. 
 

If being liked and being fair to the players matters more than holding guys accountable and not fuging with what’s working, then he could still screw us up even with pro bowl talent everywhere. 
 

Gus Fring said it best “never make the same mistake twice”

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave Canales just feels like a guy marking time.
He’s not a “bust your ass and chase perfection” Landry type, and he’s not a “you’re a good man, now let’s find your best self” Rivera type either. He doesn’t inspire greatness, but he doesn’t tolerate outright laziness either.

He’s basically football’s version of middle management, competent, steady, and fine at keeping things from collapsing, but not the kind of leader who changes a culture or puts a team on his back. You get the sense ownership hired him to keep the lights on while they figure out what’s next.

In short, he’s not the problem… but he’s never going to be the solution either.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, strato said:

Just about everyone I have ever seen that was a first time HC, mostly successful coordinators, said there was stuff they couldn’t have imagined. 
Canales only had one season as a coordinator. A steep learning curve should be expected. Help in the form of a mentor would have been a good idea. 

Aren’t there two former HCs on staff, Capers and the former WF…Lions HC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Darrell Jackson would be a fantastic pickup for us, I think he could replace 80% of what A’Shawn gave us last year. With more passing rush upside going forward in the future, I’m a big proponent of large framed defensive tackles. Pairing Derrick Brown with another 6’5 35inch arm length DT would be so fun to watch. Let’s continue being huge in the middle, allow our linebackers to flow to the ball uninterrupted.
    • Fully agree that the best thing to do is ignore them, which takes a away their thrill of thinking they got to you.
    • I agree with you on the pick of Thienemen in the first. I think he will still be there and he's a smart, fast and sturdy player. He's who we need back there. In the second, I like Rodriguez over Golday. I agree that off the ball linebackers are desperately needed here, even with our great FA pick up. I think with our third pick, we're going to dip into OT territory instead of the D-line. While I agree that we need another disruptor at the point of attack that is stout enough to just stonewall a center and a guard at the same time, we've got a shaky and expensive O-line at the present that is just about to age out of the game. I think we snag Blake Miller out of Clemson here and give him a year behind Moton to learn and put some weight and strength on. He can also jump right in and play right guard at any time. Also, and this might sound crazy, but anyone who has put up with multiple seasons at Clemson will be able to take the heat and humidity of training camp at the start of the season and early games against the NFCSouth.  Beyond that, your guess is as good as mine. We do need that QB for competition and realistically to study for back-up. Luke Altmyer out of Illinois seems to fit the mold of the point guard type QB that they want from Bryce. That'd make an apples to apples situation that could make coaching and game planning easy. On the other hand North Dakota State's Cole Payton could be an intriguing choice as well as a big dual threat guy. Both could be there for our fourth pick or both could be gone. Will QBs continue to slide this season like last? Who knows? 
×
×
  • Create New...