Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales just outcoached LaFleur


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, electro's horse said:

is this really outcoaching? because of the choosing a side thing? that was a decision made well before the game im sure

he doesn't touch the defense which shut down one of the best offenses in the league

he settled for a 50 yard field goal with a rookie kicker to win

he won with the RB he refused to play for two weeks

i dunno kinda feels like he just sorta kramer'd into this win

As I said in the game thread, seemed like he finally read into the Huddle thisbpast week.

Literally consensus here was finally the gameplan he rolled with offensively. About fuging time.

Ball control, Rico heavy, QB light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ok2h8pep said:

I agree.  I think the huddle is too hard on Evero.   His entire defensive plan is to get the other team into the red zone so he can hold them to a field goal.    I think we are a safety and a off ball linebacker away from a truly elite defense  and hopefully they open the purse for him in the next FA and Draft.

He was a good soldier last year when the FO fuged him yet again on talent, to prop up their stupid mistake. 
I haven’t judged him for last year. It wasn’t his fault. If he gets another year and we add to the talent of his unit, I expect competency. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

As I said in the game thread, seemed like he finally read into the Huddle thisbpast week.

Literally consensus here was finally the gameplan he rolled with offensively. About fuging time.

Ball control, Rico heavy, QB light.

Well, we knew it largely because of how he approached the Dallas game.  And Foxball. But we saw it done with this team and know it can be done. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, electro's horse said:

is this really outcoaching? because of the choosing a side thing? that was a decision made well before the game im sure

he doesn't touch the defense which shut down one of the best offenses in the league

he settled for a 50 yard field goal with a rookie kicker to win

he won with the RB he refused to play for two weeks

i dunno kinda feels like he just sorta kramer'd into this win

All valid and kind of where I land.

 

im ecstatic we won, but we’ve lost several games we shouldn’t have because of his refusal to make adjustments despite how crystal clear the need was.  And this is a much bigger credit to Evero and the defense and Fitzgerald, because the decision to take the game out of your QB’s hands because you don’t trust him and force us into kicking a 50+ yard FG attempt on a windy Lambeau day to win the game was so conservative it would make John Fox blush.  We’re lucky Fitz was up for the moment.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, electro's horse said:

is this really outcoaching? because of the choosing a side thing? that was a decision made well before the game im sure

he doesn't touch the defense which shut down one of the best offenses in the league

he settled for a 50 yard field goal with a rookie kicker to win

he won with the RB he refused to play for two weeks

i dunno kinda feels like he just sorta kramer'd into this win

One way or another, we beat a far better team. Weird to not give the staff any credit but whatever 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...