Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another example of Bryce playing chess that casuals wouldn’t notice or appreciate


Super Grateful
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

Did not remember him coming from NO. So next to last castoff?

Hell, now that you mention it Bridgewater might also be a push at the QB. 

I wouldn’t have counted Dalton since he was brought in to be the clear backup. But yeah Teddy played decent when Brees was hurt so we gave him starter money instead of just rolling with Cam for one more season or drafting a QB. It might not have mattered anyway with how badly Rhule fumbled everything

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/3/2025 at 8:42 PM, XClown1986 said:

I just saw this. The fact he leans over and sets the protection for Dowdle was a nice fake out. You could tell the edges held up instead of crashing down, trying to keep Bryce in the pocket, while the backers and secondary flowed to their coverages. The Packers loaded the box and if they thought it was a run, they easily could have stuffed it. 

Yes. definitely worth trading the farm for a #1 pick just to be 11-20 for 102 yards and an INT because he can call an audible. maybe this was scripted and judging by how this offense has operated, this was probably scripted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Yes. definitely worth trading the farm for a #1 pick just to be 11-20 for 102 yards and an INT because he can call an audible. maybe this was scripted and judging by how this offense has operated, this was probably scripted.

Project on someone else. I never said anything about "his worth". Just commenting on a single play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Car123 said:

Jimmy Clausen? Get out of here with that comparison.

Yards per play they are comparable. And that's a rookie Jimmy Clausen while Bryce is 38 games deep. The only difference is Bryce Young has decent legs. You don't have to like it. But it's reality.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, frankw said:

Yards per play they are comparable. And that's a rookie Jimmy Clausen while Bryce is 38 games deep. The only difference is Bryce Young has decent legs. You don't have to like it. But it's reality.

Yards yards yards

jfc, some of y’all sound like when other fanbases used to say the lack of passing yards by Cam means he isn’t a good passer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Yards yards yards

jfc, some of y’all sound like when other fanbases used to say the lack of passing yards by Cam means he isn’t a good passer.

Cam Newton was a rookie of the year and MVP and had one of the best arms in the NFL in his prime. He passed the eye test in spades. It is unbelievably comical that you chastise me for mentioning Bryce has similarities to Clausen and then you just invoke Cam Newton like that makes any sense to a rational observer whatsoever. Even Cam Newton with his questionable at times accuracy is a whole world away from where we are now with a #1 pick 38 games into his career being amongst the bottom in the league in multiple key statistical metrics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Yards yards yards

jfc, some of y’all sound like when other fanbases used to say the lack of passing yards by Cam means he isn’t a good passer.

yards 

completion %

ints

fumbles

EPA per dropback

qbr

 

Its way more than yards my brother, its just you refusing to believe your lying eyes

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Verge said:

Are we really to the point of comparing Bryce to Jimmy Clausen? Lmao 

You've largely served as a key source of Bryce Young propaganda so certainly no one here expects you to acknowledge difficult truths.

Hope things go well for you on your next lengthy hiatus we all know you'll be taking soon. God forbid you actually show up when things aren't going well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...