Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, strato said:

Off the top of my head I have one game that we were able to win by more than one score lol. 
edit: yeah that would get us to 7. Lol. 
hey it is nice to win however you do it. It’s just funny, a little. Like, we can’t get farther ahead of anybody than one score. So our wins, by default, are just gonna be one score wins. 

I understand the logic behind tracking that sort of thing, but it still strikes me as a double edged sword kind of thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I understand the logic behind tracking that sort of thing, but it still strikes me as a double edged sword kind of thing.

This thing with the Panthers right now, seems to be a nature of the beast situation. We honestly cannot outscore people by more than one score.
One time out of 13. 

We can lose by more, no problem. We can keep it close and lose. We just don’t win big. Any time we win, almost, it is by just enough. 

It feels different to me than teams that have a particularly great year in one score games. Played a lot of them and won more than their share of them. And the next year can’t buy a tight win. (That seems to be the typical scenario) I don’t know why it just feels different than that. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's just not good enough. We need everything else to go perfect to win with Bryce. He got outplayed today by a 2nd round rookie. That was the biggest difference in the game today. Their QB was better than ours. Throwing at a 63% clip with a 6.8ypa average just isn't getting it done. Especially when the opponent throws at a 75% clip with an 8.5ypa average.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...