Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker is in a sling…. The division is a 2 horse race!


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

I like Baker and not rooting for his injury, but if we can sneak 1 win against the Rams / 49ers / Seahawks then it’s a straight up dog fight for the division

IMG_1697.jpeg

I dislike Baker and am rooting for his injury.

Anything that helps us beat the Bucs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I see it this way, we could beat the Saints on the road, Seattle at home.  Will probably lose to the Niners and Rams.

That means we are 8-7 excluding the Bucs games.  For us to win the division, we could hope to tie the Bucs and win the head-to-head. to do that, we have to sweep Tampa Bay and finish 10-7 (yes--the Saints loss is killer).

Here is why:

The Bucs, on the other hand, have an EASY schedule.  AT HOME:  Cardinals, Falcons, Saints, Panthers.  AWAY:  Panthers and Dolphins.  I see them winning at least 4 more games.  If they beat the Cards, the Falcons, the Saints, and the Dolphins, they have 10 wins.  Probably expected because no team has over 4 wins except the Panthers.

Even if Baker is out, I see them winning 4 down the stretch, making their overall record 10-7 if they lose both games to the Panthers.  If so, we go.

While it could happen; I sense the Panthers are starting to feel it, but I thought that before the home game vs. New Orleans, so we shall see.  I give the Panthers about a 10-20% chance of pulling it off

 

My biggest thing is that down the stretch we could be facing three different QBs that have revenge on their minds for us jettisoning us: Bridgewater, Mayfield (assuming they split the two due to Baker's injury) and Darnold. Add in that we have McCaffrey that we traded away for peanuts.

It's bad karma.

But we're also the black cats, so maybe that bad karma whips back around and works for us.

Oh, who the heck knows. We're competitive and there are opportunities ahead of us if we can make it through tonight.

I mean, when was the last time we were in first place in the NFCSouth past the second week?

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

Here’s your sources of dogshit

 

2 we got rid of

1 will be a stain for a while

Baker failed in miserable organizations (Panthers / Browns) just like Darnold (Jets / Panthers)

IMG_1698.webp

IMG_1699.webp

Baker was dog poo. Darnold played better for us by far. Both needed to go elsewhere to up their game for the reasons you highlighted but Baker really was bad here. Darnold at least was passable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

My biggest thing is that down the stretch we could be facing three different QBs that have revenge on their minds for us jettisoning us: Bridgewater, Mayfield (assuming they split the two due to Baker's injury) and Darnold. Add in that we have McCaffrey that we traded away for peanuts.

It's bad karma.

But we're also the black cats, so maybe that bad karma whips back around and works for us.

Oh, who the heck knows. We're competitive and there are opportunities ahead of us if we can make it through tonight.

I mean, when was the last time we were in first place in the NFCSouth past the second week?

 

Why would CMC need revenge. We did him a MOTHER fuging SOLID. he should sit out tonight as a thank you

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Why would CMC need revenge. We did him a MOTHER fuging SOLID. he should sit out tonight as a thank you

Yeah, I'd be really salty if I got traded and immediately went to the superbowl with one of the top 2 offensive minds in the game, won offensive player of the year and was living in one of the most desirable areas in the world. We really gave him the shaft!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...