Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Week 12: Panthers @ 49ers Gameday Thread


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, shaq said:

“Stiff arm” dude put down the bud light or whatever your smoking, Tet had clear separation and the defender grabbed his arm pulling him back. The announcers spent minutes going over the replay saying it’s clear defensive PI. Go to bed bud 

We still lost the game, so who gives AF?  You think if we make that pass we had a chance to win?  L O L

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, strato said:

that has been my position

 But I realize tonight that I hate Bryce as the Panthers QB so bad that if it takes Dave being clipped to get rid of Bryce, I accept the proposition. Without question. 

I can’t take any more of it  

 

I feel for Canales because BY clearly isn't a QB that he wants. But also, if we get rid of both and get a coach that can use Rico correctly, I'll take it. Rico with a coach like McDaniel breaks records.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

The Rams are a Super Bowl team

im going to make other plans for Sunday

girl, it will be 30 to nothing by halftime.  Stafford is outer worldly this year

It's going to be soo sad I'm going to try to make it to halftime but I may switch to another game before if  the score is too out of hand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shaq said:

“Stiff arm” dude put down the bud light or whatever your smoking, Tet had clear separation and the defender grabbed his arm pulling him back. The announcers spent minutes going over the replay saying it’s clear defensive PI. Go to bed bud 

the announcee said it was and it was but thr announcer also said before the pi tet needed to be careful bc they could have called offensive pi for his shove with his arm oit od the break.  either way young sucks and would have made no difference 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wolfpredator said:

We still lost the game, so who gives AF?  You think if we make that pass we had a chance to win?  L O L

Yes exactly that was a game altering miscall. If we got the correct call we would have had the ability to be near the redzone and potentially score a TD to bring the game within 3, with 3 timeouts. Only needing to stop them once to get the ball back, so yes that horrible no call is something us as actual Panthers fans should care about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jopie87 said:

I feel for Canales because BY clearly isn't a QB that he wants. But also, if we get rid of both and get a coach that can use Rico correctly, I'll take it. Rico with a coach like McDaniel breaks records.

we could have won that game with better play calling, but in spite of our qb so yes. in spite

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...