Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales


scratched
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

They said on the broadcast last night what I have been saying. Canales is limited to what he can do because of Bryce. Last week in Atlanta he seemed genuinely so happy that he got to use most of the playbook and Bryce set a record. But from week to week we never know which Bryce is going to show up. The Atlanta Bryce was obviously a fluke. If he could play Atlanta every week he'd be good. 

can't do a QB sneak
can't do any designed QB runs that go up the middle/danger zone
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noteably posted a thread following the Saints game defending Canales for his play calling.  Again, I still do not think he called a bad game against New Orleans.  That said, As bad as bryce was, Canales was equally awful.  In the saints game, they legit sold out and stopped the run and because of that he was forced to pass and it was bryce not excecuting that caused the problems.

Yesterday however, play design was as poor as the actual play itself.  SF did not sell out to stop the run, we were hitting 6 ypc, but we just said no.  When we did pass it was throws to the flat, no down field, none of what was successful last week.  If we did throw past 5 yards it went to one single guy.  It was all around putrid.

I will defend his first down at the one playcall however, this was way early and he hadnt had yet to see the run game succeed really like he did later, the biggest problem was that was one of the worst reads I've ever seen a QB make.  There were 5 guys on the reciever...everyone was covered, throw the fuging ball away.

However, from there, instead of seeing that his QB had turned back into a pumpkin, he doubled down in an "effort" to get him in a "rhythm"...although without uptempo, without movement, just safe throws to the flat.  Clearly he lost faith in bryce after that, but instead of focusing on the thing thats successful, he abandoned the run game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

I noteably posted a thread following the Saints game defending Canales for his play calling.  Again, I still do not think he called a bad game against New Orleans.  That said, As bad as bryce was, Canales was equally awful.  In the saints game, they legit sold out and stopped the run and because of that he was forced to pass and it was bryce not excecuting that caused the problems.

Yesterday however, play design was as poor as the actual play itself.  SF did not sell out to stop the run, we were hitting 6 ypc, but we just said no.  When we did pass it was throws to the flat, no down field, none of what was successful last week.  If we did throw past 5 yards it went to one single guy.  It was all around putrid.

I will defend his first down at the one playcall however, this was way early and he hadnt had yet to see the run game succeed really like he did later, the biggest problem was that was one of the worst reads I've ever seen a QB make.  There were 5 guys on the reciever...everyone was covered, throw the fuging ball away.

However, from there, instead of seeing that his QB had turned back into a pumpkin, he doubled down in an "effort" to get him in a "rhythm"...although without uptempo, without movement, just safe throws to the flat.  Clearly he lost faith in bryce after that, but instead of focusing on the thing thats successful, he abandoned the run game.

if we used the MIA, Dallas, and GB games gameplan last night against the 49ers, we blow them out with the 3 INTs

But instead we get Canales out smarting himself

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

if we used the MIA, Dallas, and GB games gameplan last night against the 49ers, we blow them out with the 3 INTs

But instead we get Canales out smarting himself

Miami and Dallas have the worst defenses in the league.

Packers game plan managed 16 points and won on a fluke.

they’re not a good offense. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Miami and Dallas have the worst defenses in the league.

Packers game plan managed 16 points and won on a fluke.

they’re not a good offense. 

So do the 49ers though you look at their defensive metrics they were near the bottom in about everything that mattered. 

I'm sure we helped their stats now however with our (offensive) performance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

So do the 49ers though you look at their defensive metrics they were near the bottom in about everything that mattered. 

I'm sure we helped their stats now however with our (offensive) performance. 

Dallas is historically bad on defense.

Miami is trash.

they had two good games from a rb on a one year deal and everyone overreacted and thought we’d signed Gayle Sayers.

i don’t doubt saleh would have figured out a way to stop a hypothetical run heavy offense either. Bryce can’t hit poo 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Dallas is historically bad on defense.

Miami is trash.

they had two good games from a rb on a one year deal and everyone overreacted and thought we’d signed Gayle Sayers.

i don’t doubt saleh would have figured out a way to stop a hypothetical run heavy offense either. Bryce can’t hit poo 

Green Bay actually has a good defense much better than the 49ers.

This game should of been reflective of Dallas and Miami with both offenses moving the ball and the first defense that gets a stop wins at the end.

Nothing about 49ers defensive numbers show they were capable of shutting down anything other than an incompatible offense that clearly the Panthers have. 

Edited by Pantherxtreme
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Dallas is historically bad on defense.

Miami is trash.

they had two good games from a rb on a one year deal and everyone overreacted and thought we’d signed Gayle Sayers.

i don’t doubt saleh would have figured out a way to stop a hypothetical run heavy offense either. Bryce can’t hit poo 

You are probably right but you have to make him prove it. You change only if he proves it.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, scratched said:

His seat has to be hot! In the 2 most pivotal games this year, NO at home and SF on Monday night football, he finds a way to look even worse than BY! He needs to give up play calling duties, and hope it changes the trajectory, if he truly wants to keep his job. 9 carries by our RBs and 2 pass attempts to TEs against a team who is extremely weak at LB position is unacceptable. His use of TOs was terrible and his decision on when to go for it and when not to was terrible! I think we need him gone and bring in someone who picks the QB they want to run the offense. This just isn't working. 

You have pretty high standards for a fan of a franchise that hasn't had a winning record in nearly a decade.

Dude is winning with a team in full rebuild mode with a traffic cone at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
    • Look at what the Bears have done with Caleb Williams, drafting playmaking WR's and TE's and making it easier for him to operate the offense. Conception is perfect for what the offense needs (speed and someone who can make defenders miss) and as today, April 11th, I think he's the pick @19 
×
×
  • Create New...