Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

J Person article on Canales and game plan and Rico


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I honestly believe that DC knows exactly what he is doing, he is exposing BY!  Proving to everyone that BY isn’t it.  I believe it is his mission before the end of this season to send Bryce out there, trying to light it up, just to fail so when they move on from him this offseason DC has no detractors, no locker room issues and most importantly no David Tepper issues.  Is it hurting us now?  Yes but Dave knows a little pain now is well worth the future without BY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think that.  
I might think that he is pushing Young to sink or swim. Rise to the challenge or don’t.

I could think that he believed Young was gonna kill it. 

Not sure what I think past if Young can’t do it we need to try someone else. And I don’t think he can do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Waldo said:

Lol Rico isn't coming back regardless lol.

DC isn't a terrible HC but he also isn't good. He is a solid OC way over his head and another year isn't changing that IMO. 

I’m trying to figure out if he is a solid OC, his game plan and play calling suck, that’s what a good OC is supposed implement week in and week out. I’m just not seeing it. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, csx said:

I have eased up on this. He was incredibly stupid Monday. However I dont advocate firing. We cant keep doing that and expect better coaches.

He better have learned that obvious lesson 

It’ll be extremely hard to bring an elite coach into this dumpster fire, not to mention having to deal with the Teppers.  So yeah, fix the QB problem and then deal with coaching if need be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ncbob said:

I’m trying to figure out if he is a solid OC, his game plan and play calling suck, that’s what a good OC is supposed implement week in and week out. I’m just not seeing it. 

I would agree but he has about a half capable QB to deal with. That offense has to be limited.  I can’t imagine what he had to pull off the table.  Just play action alone, big challenge. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what really sucks.  I would bet almost bet to every man on this forum that if we went 7-10 or 8-9 they would have said it was a successful season.  Say we beat N.O. and TB gives us the last game of the season because they can't lose the division and won't play their top players.

We go 8-9.  Canales is a genius, and we are stuck with Young and Canales for another year.  Worst part is we only beat 1 quality team in GB minus TB who won't play their starters.

I've had enough of Canales's moronic game planning.  There is no excuse for the amount of carries this team had Sunday.  Yeah, it was fun to see Bryce have a career day against Atlanta. If you play sports long enough, you'll have a day where you couldn't do no wrong.  To game plan around the passing game was just plan moronic.   SF defense was mediocre at best, and we managed 1 TD and 1 FG.  WTF.

But watch and see.  We'll end up 7-10 or 8-9 and everyone is going to say we had a good year.  Canales and Young are back in the saddle in 2026.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I actually disagree. As many morons as the Huddle has, it's very hard to be as grossly incompetent as David Tepper has been.

I don't care if we fire Canales or not. He will get that accomplished himself soon enough without any Huddle input at all.

Its clear what they were trying to do.  You know how when a team gets exposed by another team and everyone is like well thats the blueprint to beating them.  The 49ers game before us they gave up an NFL record 47 completions to Jacoby Brissett of all people.  I assume they thought if Brissett could dink and dunk pick apart the 49ers then our qb definitely can.  Unfortunately they thought wrong on that part.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, strato said:

I would agree but he has about a half capable QB to deal with. That offense has to be limited.  I can’t imagine what he had to pull off the table.  Just play action alone, big challenge. 

Man I totally agree, half the playbook is gathering dust because of our QB, but we’re not using the proven weapons that we have, totally frustrating.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...